Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Akuma

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 210
Complaints Board / Re: A rule complaint
« on: May 27, 2020, 23:34 »
My suggestion is: ksv or whoever is supermod takes requests which are complaint about mods.

Someone else from admins takes "complaints on supermod" requests, there are 2 possibilities imo.

1. You dedicate an admin to resolve these requests and switch it daily/weekly/monthly at your choice. In my opinion 3 of you (shadowlord aleksandar jimmy) are very experienced and your decision is more trustworthy, while Jeandarc has been around long enough probably the longest among us so he probably knows everything already so he would be a fine option as well. The one you choose (or its his task day) has "last word".

2. You all discuss it (privately or publicly the choice is yours), reach some decision and its the actual "last word".

I'm fine with both options.

There are not many requests which complain on supermod, but they still exist, and as long as they exist they shouldn't be forbidden by some rule (which is currently the case). They won't take much of your time whatever option you choose.

Complaints Board / A rule complaint
« on: May 27, 2020, 18:36 »
~ Ban & Unban Super Moderator has the last word regarding Complains, user can not demand Global Admin/Administrator to review his case.

I've just happened to notice this, and I think it makes no sense, I'd like it discussed and explained by admins - Therefore I don't need opinions of other normal users on this matter so I kindly ask you not to respond here unless you are admin (or a deer, they are always welcome in my topics)

I'll state my case why it makes no sense, and by this I don't mean to belittle ksv or any other mod, super mod or anyone else, so I'll caps to make it clear its not PERSONAL AGAINST ANYONE.


1. Ksv is a good guy, I appreciate all the work he is doing here but he makes mistakes. In my opinion too much mistakes for the position he is having. Of-course he will fix that over time, but I don't think he should be trusted with ultimate "last word" yet.

2. What happens to requests b&u supermod takes and there is a complaint on them? Here actually doesn't matter who is in that position, but do you really want such guy to solve a request - receive a complain - resolve a complain. This basically means player who posted request/complain doesn't even get a second opinion.

3. Having one guy getting "last word" isn't really a good thing, and at this point once again it doesn't matter who the "b&u super mod" is - the decision reached mutually by 4 admins where 3 of them are very experienced in b&u is much better than having any "single" guy reaching one. I don't think I need to explain this any further.

Also 3. is actually what Jean told me during our PM conversation, and I supported it completely. So I find this rule rather contradictory to what I heard in our conversation. (or perhaps I misunderstood you jean).

Thanks for the time reading this, have a nice day.

PS: complaints = plural of complain (and not complains as written twice in these rules) - not sure who wrote these actually but check your grammar bro (not meaning to offend)

Suggestion Board / Re: Still awaiting reply
« on: May 26, 2020, 08:58 »
Why are you reopening topics, isn't that considered a spam?

Suggestion Board / Re: How does the complaint system work?
« on: May 26, 2020, 08:54 »
Basically, i asked him about situation where one would have a complaint about LA high staff and he meant that it should be solved on LA only.

Yes, 4 admins are enough to solve any problems, they discuss these problems together if you got banned there was a reason, same thing when I got banned.

So how does it work, if i have problem with highest LA administration it would mean that there is absolutely nothing to do about it? Maybe it may seem strange but you know that there already was problem between me and the LA high staff when i got banned for literally nothing, so this question interests me.

You tend to have a lot problems with lot of people apparently, I doubt its any admin to blame.

Shouldnt there be some regulation or the LA staff has full trust of the server administrators and unless some really big shit happens nobody will review the decisions of high staff?

No, because they discuss these things and reach mutual decision, unless all of them go berserk for some reason server admin will be aware of this much before you do.

PS: i have no problems right now but you never know what happens, it would be good to forsee and prevent problems early

Stop being efko.

Suggestion Board / A related topic
« on: May 17, 2020, 17:43 »,191079.0.html

Related to this topic, since my name was spoken there.

1) Why some people can spam complaints until their point of view is accepted, is the complainer the one who is solving request or maybe a neural moderator should do that?

Not all people can spam complaints, only I can spam complaints,I highly disapprove any other people spamming complaints (by spam I mean making more than one), since usually they don't have a clue what they are doing. This may sound arrogant, but its simple as that.

I know what I am talking about since I was leading this exact section for years

2) Whats the point of having head of b&u section at all if nobody cares about his decisions??? Dont like his decisions, spam aleksandar, dont like aleksandar's decision, spam shadowlord etc etc, is that an acceptable way of handling requests?

I don't care about who brings decision, as long as the decision is correct one. Moderators usually get it right = no complaints.
I agreed with ksv as well and some of his bans when that myprecious complained, and I supported a decision = no complaints.

I highly value and I highly care what sejtura and ksv and everyone else in b&u section does. Personally no problem with either, the decision making can make a problem sometimes but once again its nothing personal.
ksv just didn't put enough effort, when solving my complaint. He agreed with moderator and they were both wrong. I disliked this lack of effort so I decided to complain with someone who will give a satisfactory explanation.
I might not agree with him being the leader of b&u but its not that he can't change, and change my opinion as well. Hopefully one day he will be the best one, and he will be schooling some newbie mods, just like I am schooling them now.

I'll just quote Aleksandar, and the exact point I wanted to show to those guys who were solving my case, and their mistake. (Jimmy basically, told me the same thing once we discussed in game, but I decided to leave Jimmy out of this, because he wanted to be out of it.)

and the quote is.
But i want to be clear,IT CANT be the reason to insult someone's family.

I wanted to hear these words from sejtura/ksv, and I even asked them a couple of times, but they seemed to fail the point. I am sure they won't miss such points again.

Another thing, my complaints were not a discussion board, and you were not invited to join. I don't give a fuck about your opinion and I'd kindly ask any of the admins to officially warn you for spamming in official section (@Jimmy Consider this an offical complaint, or do you want me to make one? It's your rule after all. I'll just remind you that last time I spammed some turkish player complaint you banned me for a month, and I agreed with this ban. Right?)

Complaints Board / Re: Complaint about ksv decision
« on: May 14, 2020, 22:54 »
He got sanction... I don't know what else you asking for ?

Well obviously for harsher sanction, thats the point of complaining - showing a disagreement against a certain thing.

For the first time family flame he got warn... Next time sanction would be different. Maybe he would get more than warn if he was not provoked.

Answer me the question, if someone provokes me during game, do I get ban immunity for family flaming him, and would I end up with just a warn?
I am not even to start explaining again who provoked who and why.
I am sure he would not wisper you if you didn't provoke him.

You are sure based on what?

If someone mute you and you insult or flame that player before other teammates or enemies... You think it is not breaking Ingame Rules ?

You want to ban me for saying "mk trash" once, and you keep pointing out that somehow I broke the rules, while failing to ban him for 1000x worse thing.

Sure go ahead if saying "mk trash" thing is bannable, ban me.

And one more thing... He got sanction for first time family flame while you did not get sanction for votekick abuse against innocent player !!

I explained several times already why my votekicks were a valid thing to do, yet somehow you all fail to read my posts I suppose.

Btw those lil rules you're quoting are kinda reworked by me, so I am more than familiar with them.

I don't know why you get it personal, you're not the first nor the last mod to make a mistake. Mistakes simply happen, and instead of fighting and keeping your own wrong opinion you could've just agreed you made a mistake and fixed it.
This is probably not even the last time I will complain on your or some other moderator decision in order to improve yourselves or if I feel you are not investing enough of your time in these requests.

Complaints Board / Re: Complaint about ksv decision
« on: May 14, 2020, 15:35 »
1 time the number of votes was 7/8, when probaly enraged player whitch was !votekicked sent a /w to the x-13 player, and the most  unbealivable situation player x-13 makes a screen shoot of the /w and makes a ban request

This is exactly what i am talking about, his failure for detail is amazing, if you took 10 seconds to check proofs instead of writting a load of bullshit you'd realize.

The time on my screenshot is 24 minutes and 9 seconds.
while this happened 20 minutes after that.
43:26 [All] [BiliG] voted to kick [ilovestanija] [7/8]

Do you base your decisions on "probably" or do you actually take some facts into consideration while solve request? This is exactly you proving my point of your incapability do be in the position you're in.

You can always improve, and even earn my respect, but to do this you need to do things properly.

And yes, I'll wait for admin who will solve this as it should be solved.

Complaints Board / Re: Complaint about ksv decision
« on: May 14, 2020, 14:32 »
Hm like I said before I value Sejturas work here on LA as a staff member, 2 different mods can have 2 different oppinions on a same case, and so on, I tend to support my team members. He/s decision was based on he/s oppinon of the case, anyhow I‚ll give you my full opinion on the case soon.

And I value sejtura's work as well, but it doesn't mean he is right here and that you should by default agree with him. Do I need to remind you who I was before, and that I am perfectly aware of any rules, and I am perfectly aware what he did right and what he did wrong.

You didn't answer this, your simple answer to this question will prove everything I said here true.
Do I get a ban immunity for family flaming/hard cursing after someone votekicks me for whatever reason or for no reason at all, because well it provoked me so hard?

Complaints Board / Re: Complaint about ksv behavior
« on: May 14, 2020, 14:26 »
This isn't personal, and I really don't care about ksv, I care about this community and people experience here.

Deer has a point, I never said your autobans were intentional, I do not care to check 70 autobans, the sheer number speaks for itself. The fact is you ruined each of those games you dropped, being intentional or not isn't important, the number of games you ruined however is very important, and its outstanding. As I already said its probably even higher than 70, thats probably as far as logs can go up.

I can notice you dropped games in a row, would you unban random player who drops 3 games in a row and come asking for unban? Well I certainly hope you wouldn't, and I saw you deny such cases (even when drop was unintentional, and this was however correct decision).
This lasted for months, and you provided zero care to fix a problem and stop ruining games for others as well as for yourself (if we trust your autobans are caused by PC error and not some raging, you probably don't like dropping every 2nd game you play. Once again I don't care to check) so you proved to be a lazy person as well.

I ask for your improvement, I ask to dedicate your time if you want to have this position you're having. Not failing to adding bans, and actually checking what people write, and check replays. I don't want to have b&u super mod who just "agrees" on what newbie moderator posted, since its quite normal for newbie moderator to make mistake. Instead of teaching him, you support him and you make him believe that his wrong decision was right.

Also you should stop playing until your fix your PC for obvious reasons, you needed to do this a long time ago but better now then never. It doesn't have to be a definite ammount of time, if you can fix those tomorrow, feel free to play tomorrow for all I care.

Complaints Board / Complaint about ksv behavior
« on: May 14, 2020, 12:36 »
I think you guys need to do some checks about your staff members, and be more selective in the process.

Admins are supposed to be examples, so how come he managed to get 70 autobans, and accumulate over 3 months of ban duration, meanwhile abusing bot status keep joining and leaving or whatever happened there (I doubt anyone will check 70 autobans lol)
I am not saying all 70 autobans are some rage leaves, but having 70 autobans speaks for itself right?;sa=player;sid=1;nick=ksv
It's probably even longer, not sure how many logs can the page support lmao.

So basically he abused his bot access more than 70 times, not once, or twice but 70 times.

I've already complained few times about how he failed to apply sanctions, missing the basic point of b&u section. You can find these complaints in this board.

His decisions are just not good enough. He makes a good decision sometimes, but usually its completely random. I don't think he even checks replays or puts any particular effort in solving these requests, meaning he is holding his position mainly to have a bot access and leave games which he doesn't like.

Obviously given provided reasons, I can't trust him to be a valid super mod. Its bad for a community, and I am pretty sure people in those 70 games minded him leaving their game. Do you really need a guy who behaves like this?

(Btw no idea who provided me this info about his autobans from a fake account on discord, but its a good thing you did.)

Complaints Board / Re: Complaint about ksv decision
« on: May 14, 2020, 10:31 »
OK. It seems some additional explanation is required.

Also man try not to use CapsLock, you from all the people should know the rules, and that this can get you banned on forum. (if I was a forum Admin I would ban you after this post)

I used caps lock merely to point out some important things, not as a rage tool. 80% of my report is in normal letters.

I would bitch slap you if you said all of this in my face
Is this a threat? Is that how b&u super mod behaves? I didn't mean to insult you, I called you a joke because your decision was not more than a joke. Anyway feel free to try and "bitch slap" me, you will realize its easier said than done.

Funny proposal, maby we should call this page Complaint/Akuma and hes bots section

Do you have a problem with me posting a complaint about things that dissatisfy me? Isn't this what the board is for, a complaints?

Just a fucking note and a question in the end, and I really hope you answer me this correctly.

Do you understand that a player with hard cursing didn't get banned because "he got provoked".
this hard cursing came after first of the votekicks (all the other votekicks happened later, so they are irrelevant)

IF you are right, and IF I am wrong regarding provocation thing, that a SINGLE votekick triggered him into saying all these flames to me, and ending up with measly warn.
So a question is: Do I get a ban immunity for family flaming/hard cursing after someone votekicks me for whatever reason or for no reason at all, because well it provoked me so hard?

Complaints Board / Complaint about ksv decision
« on: May 14, 2020, 02:59 »
I'd like @-Aleksandar- to take a look at this, since obviously your b&u team can't do proper job.

I'll point out the so fucking many mistakes he made by not following simple guidelines. So lets start.

Just watched a game, it was a max 1600 psr game, so not a PRO or  turnament game where you can complain if some or one of your teammate doesn\t do what is expected from him

And where the actual fuck I reported this. My report was for family flame/cursing.
My EXPLANATION was given to point out his "beautiful style of playing" and to show a reason behind votekicks, BUT I NEVER REPORTED HIM FOR GAME RUIN BECAUSE I ALREADY FIGURED OUT HE IS BRAINDEAD (Do I really need to draw things here?)

You started first with calling names

Absolute bullshit and completely wrong. He started calling everyone idiots, and ignored 3 of us. AFTER THIS I CALLED HIM "mk trash" once, BUT I SAID IT AS INFORMATION TO MY TEAMMATES AND NOT DIRECTLY TO HIM. HE IGNORED ME SO HE COULDN'T EVEN READ THOSE, SO HOW THE FUCK COULD THEY PROVOKE HIM?

"Who said what first" can be really easily checked if you simply checked the chatlog. (I am spoonfeeding this to you.)

!votekick abuse for no reason (when I say no reason I mean there were no rules broken

He missed 2 teamfights. He ignored balanar attacking and killing enigma and later bloodseeker and instead just moved around in lothar. He completely missed another teamfight at roshan AND HE EVEN ADMITTED ON CHAT HE DID IT ON PURPOSE, AND I FUCKING PROVIDED IT AS A PROOF SO YOU DON'T EVEN NEED TO CHECK IT. (because maiden "stole his kill")

and the player whitch you wanted to kick was the best player in the game

Now you just proved to be a fucking joke.

and you were blood with dagon for the first item, Hm ...

So if you go some alternate build thats a bad thing, once again you're a fucking joke. Crystal maiden had desolator, buriza and mkb and his gameplay was fun.

toxic players will not be tolerated on the server anymore.

Did You just fucking say this while failing to ban a player who told me that he wishes my mother dies from corona virus, and some other HARD CURSES? Did you even check a screenshot I provided. You indeed are a fucking joke.

I know that you would like to comment, but this case is closed.

Its closed when you make a proper decision, Aleksandar will check it now and I trust his decision will be a reasonable one, because unlike you "newbies" he has some knowledge.

first complaint:,191024.0.html

original ban request:,191016.0.html

Offtopic / Re: What is the number?
« on: May 11, 2020, 16:20 »
The correct answer:

but the mistake is on me, I'll be more carefull next time.

Offtopic / Re: What is the number?
« on: May 11, 2020, 16:17 »
I edited my first post, since it was incorrect, I posted "digits" there and should be "spaces". The answer is obviously not in digits, so mistake is on me.

Offtopic / Re: the name riddle
« on: May 11, 2020, 16:14 »
Ofcourse you can also just read the text and say that the answer is "What"

But like i said the riddle itself is incorrect, as in this interpretation there is no question which makes the "riddle" a simple statement.

Either way you need to find more smart riddles, looking forward to you posting them

Thats the point of the riddle to pay attention to the details.

What is the correct answer.

The problem in posting riddles here is that probably any of them can be easily googled, but I might figure out something.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 210