Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - iPlayOnlyMid

Pages: [1]
Technical support / Re: Could not start war3.exe
« on: June 02, 2020, 20:55 »
It's so he understands where the stuff is.
It's called getting the bigger picture for a reason.

Technical support / Re: BNET down ?
« on: June 02, 2020, 20:26 »
w/e . Fixed. Had selected wrong bnet gateway

Technical support / BNET down ?
« on: June 02, 2020, 20:16 »
I login, to bnet.
Password accepted.


Suggestion Board / Re: Still awaiting reply
« on: June 01, 2020, 00:23 »
Makes no sense. Abuse = warn/unmod. It's that easy.
It's like we're afraid to punish staff. Instead of finding a solution we find ways to never encounter the problem.

But then again. Making !votekick NEVER MANDATORY it's what i proposed as well. Keep in mind there are players who mute/hide all chat. Everything. So they will never see ppl whine on ALL/ALLIED chat about kicking x/y.

Suggestion Board / Re: Still awaiting reply
« on: May 31, 2020, 16:45 »
1. Accused mods should never "solve/close" their threads, only bring evidence and debate on the matter.

2. Votekick should be what it is a vote. Make additional commands for mods, to kick players from game w/o voting. This way the "kick" responsibility is theirs and only theirs. Don;t need to drag the other 8 players into it.

3. Never lock forum threads, unless:
a) clearly solved and nobody replied in past 7days.
b) Or it wasn't solved, but nobody replied in 30days.
we exclude here the ban requests that ended with a ban, but not the ones that ended with no-ban. So we allow them to bring more evidence or debate.

Suggestion Board / Re: Still awaiting reply
« on: May 31, 2020, 15:19 »
I agree with OP.
The system might be better-ish than rgc/iccup. But still flawed bigtime in some aspects:

From the top of my mind.
1) Accused moderator "solving/closing" his own complaints ?

2) We get "antigamers" in like 1/3 games if we're to nitpick.
Example: some guy jungling (obviously on purpose) for 20min straight: 0/0/0 score at min 20mark;) You go post him on forums 9/10 times it's not considered game ruin (and yes.. it shouldn;t be).
YET. When mod is in game, he can declare game ruin some dude not using his spells correctly or when he needed it. :boy: Doesn;'t matter if he wards

3) The votekick rule seems weird. That one, where we are obliged/forced to kick someone who is gameruining. Even though, only mods can dictate what is "gameruin" and what is not (we exclude here the obvious cases: item destroy, ward sharing, spell abuse).

4) You combine 2) and 3) and you get this weird case where you are forced to votekick someone only because a mod says so in game. No matter how absurd/untruth the request is.  :P

4) Removing "unwanted" forum posts or closing them before the topic was consumed. Even though they are flame-free or sarcasm. Last time I checked forum as an internet-tool is for opinions, not for facts and valid information.

Pages: [1]