Messages

1

General Discussions / Re: Unofficial PlayDota.eu Tournament

« on: April 05, 2011, 21:30 »

Hello JingleBalls,

As an observer, may I ask, when the match schedules will be released and will you PM us on the matter?

2

General Discussions / Re: SIGN IN FOR UNOFFICIAL PD TOURNAMENT!

« on: April 05, 2011, 21:06 »

Please sign me as OBS: ukn.maddoc

3

Announcements / Re: New bots and stats system

« on: March 10, 2011, 11:23 »

Thank you very much for your new implememntations.
1 question...

Will everybody start with 1500 PSR? is there a way to implement current stats?

4

General Discussions / FOGCLICK or TRADEHACK implementation to the PD.Eu bot! Possible?

« on: January 16, 2011, 15:13 »

Hello everybody,

I decided to post this after I have seen many replays and MH Ban requests. It is now taking a little long for the mods to ban someone, which is understandable that they are really busy.

I wonder if there is a way to install a program to the BOT itself saying if there is a fogclick of heroes/runes or exchange of gold. (they call it tradehack I believe)

I heard that there are patches/programs that say it when a hero is fog-clicked (I do not mean collidable maps) or if there is a gold transfer between heroes. This can be seen in replay-parser(?) so why not in the bot?
http://playdota.eu/forum/index.php/topic,42610.0.html

Can this be implemented in the bot so that everybody sees it that there is a kind of hack in the game during the gameplay and END it ASAP?

Regards,

5

General Discussions / Re: 'SWITCH' question - Please Comment

« on: January 13, 2011, 15:31 »

So if you owned 3v4 and than you are 2v4 and you are imba fed (you even get more money from leavers) 3v3 would not balance the game because if you own them (they have 4 players) they would not stand the chance 3v3 because you will get extra hero plus you had extra cash when it was 3v4 (lower number of players - more gold) and they would get maybe around 300,400 each which is nothing.

So you will have to dal with it.

I very much understand the unbalanced situation here, however even with extra money, do you think you stand a chance 2v4? honestly.
Or do you agree with the rule causing 2v5 (-so on) or 1v4 (-so off)?

Would you suggest a rule? more balanced maybe?

6

General Discussions / Re: 'SWITCH' question - Please Comment

« on: January 13, 2011, 12:42 »

mostly spend time in woods and waitin my teammates to finish

And apperantly there is no way other than waiting in base and waiting them finish the game.
I believe there has to be a more fair Switch Rule..!

7

General Discussions / Re: 'SWITCH' question - Please Comment

« on: January 13, 2011, 12:16 »

hello dear noob   id like to share my uber pro wisdom with u

NEVER EVER HOSTED GAME WITH -SO  got no complains about it

true story

Hello My dear NOOB friend, I have experienced it in many games. It is your problem if you havent )
Rules are rules and first do some thinking before posting! I would rather not need dummy comments like yours.
If there is no -so and you are 2v5 you continue to play! I wont!
Thanks to PD.eu for putting a switch RULE..

for your information: @my own bot, I have over 600 games played with over 90% win. Would love to make a clan match with your noob team!

8

General Discussions / 'SWITCH' question - Please Comment

« on: January 12, 2011, 13:17 »

Hello all,
I would like to ask a question and also raise a problem within switching.

The playdota INGAME Rules say that;
- If number of players in the opposing team is greater than 3 players and the game mode includes -so (-switchon) you are free to leave the game without ban;

*Does this mean than it is 4 players (greater than 3 is 4) or is it greater and equal 3 (meaning 3 players also)? If it is 4; it means you're 1v5 which does not make sense at all. Even if the rule is 3 players; it means 1v4 or 2v5 which again still does not make sense. Who would want to play 2v5 or 1v4?

DON'T YOU THINK THERE HAS TO BE A RULE FOR SWITCHING?

Look at the example: http://stats.playdota.eu/?p=gameinfo&gid=1135486
The host denied to switch even after 1 more guy left and it was 4v2. (we were dominating the game even 4v3). The host was afraid (because I got an ultrakill just before) and told me that Noone is forced to switch and I should stop playing so they will win eventually. We lost the game 2v4 ofcourse. You find this fair?

Another RULE:
- If number of players in the opposing team is greater then 2 players and the game mode does not include -so (-switchon) you are free to leave the game without ban;
* Same comment here,  Even if there is an option of switching, ofcourse noone would want to switch to a looser team) Dont you think the game has to be fair?

I believe there has to be a SWITCH RULE that can make the game fair enough for everybody. No matter what if there are 2 leavers in one side, the other team should roll and switch the last leaver.

PLEASE COMMENT...

9

General Discussions / BANNING the OWNER of the GAME

« on: December 10, 2010, 17:04 »

Hello all,
How can we ban a leaver host/owner, if he quits without making someone else as owner?
Who can ban him? how should it be reported?