This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Johnny.
16
« on: July 25, 2012, 23:28 »
yeah every girl has boobs , but sometimes i have bigger boobs than them. we are talking about nice, big , round boobs
17
« on: July 25, 2012, 22:39 »
yeah its kinda hard to pick between these two , ofc anyone would pick both . but if you had the choice to grab just one of them , what would it be?
18
« on: July 25, 2012, 22:32 »
simple question, go vote
19
« on: July 25, 2012, 22:27 »
On any exam I'd write 2 cause of this:
Try to make it like this:
(I replace 48 with X , and put 2 to try if its correct)
x / 2(9+3) = 2
x / 2(12) = 2
x / 24 = 2
x = 2*24
x = 48 > Correct
Now, i replace 48 with X again , but this time i put right side 288 ( = 288 ) i get :
x / 2(9+3) = 288
x / 2(12) = 288
x / 24 = 288
x = 288*24
x = 6912 > Not correct (not 48)
END OF STORY
so why wouldnt you divide x (48) with 2 first ?
20
« on: July 25, 2012, 22:09 »
I'm heretic for telling the truth there is a article in wikipedia about pedmas which proves that the solution is 288,it's not my fault people are still in elementary school or that they don't know simplest rule...
I really got sick of those guys there talking about math, universities and how u are good at math.
Half of u there are 16-17 years old and havent even graduated yet.
Go sleep clever guys
I agree with him
btw in that case 2x/2x would be x on square and not 1
+1 Google says its 288 , wikipedia says its 288 , I say its 288. So its fucking 288
21
« on: July 25, 2012, 11:42 »
Lets play a game to solve this problem . Answer 2 team vs. answer 288 team. The winning teams answer will be correct and no discussion any more
22
« on: July 25, 2012, 02:18 »
Ah i got it it is 2. At last....
Exactly 144 times
just remember that : I dont want onions on my Big Mac.
23
« on: July 25, 2012, 02:12 »
Lolz nabs can't admit their mistake it's 2 and 288 if the fraction was 2* than it would be 288
btw samir well implied multiplying is not defined good enough read div.ide's(smartest guy here) link
i just explained the fraction thing but i didnt know how to draw a fraction so i did it the classic way with the /
24
« on: July 25, 2012, 02:03 »
nahhh its 288 for sure .
just treat it all like a fraction
so this 48÷2(9+3) is like this 48/2 * (9+3) and result is 288.
but in case that the problem would be like this 48÷ [ 2 (9+3) ] the fraction would look like this :
48 / 2(9+3) (so in this case 2(9+3) is under 48 in the fraction ) and the answer would be 2.
but since its not , the result is 288.
25
« on: July 25, 2012, 01:31 »
On any exam I'd write 2 cause of this:
Try to make it like this:
(I replace 48 with X , and put 2 to try if its correct)
x / 2(9+3) = 2
x / 2(12) = 2
x / 24 = 2
x = 2*24
x = 48 > Correct
Now, i replace 48 with X again , but this time i put right side 288 ( = 288 ) i get :
x / 2(9+3) = 288
x / 2(12) = 288
x / 24 = 288
x = 288*24
x = 6912 > Not correct (not 48)
So, answer is 2. My opinion.
stick to dota
26
« on: July 25, 2012, 01:11 »
Ok check it out you uber math pros. why arent you just simply doing the fucking thing from left to right . Yeah its right you HAVE do the stuff IN the brackets first , but who said that multiplying the 2 with the (9+3) has priority? So its just like that :
48 / 2 * (9 + 3) = // now you are doing the stuff in the brackets first which is 9+3=12 and you can remove the brackets now , you dont need brackets for a single number.
Then it goes like this :
48/2 * 12 =
and then go either this way 576/2 or this way 24 * 12 .
So no matter if you divide 48 with 2 first and then multiply with 12 or multiply 48 with 12 first and then divide by 2 , you will get 288
Peace I am out
27
« on: July 09, 2012, 03:01 »
would also be fun to play -arshomnpscidpmdm with -wtf on , but everyone just plays ladder games
28
« on: June 30, 2012, 15:47 »
whenever i play solo matchmaking i always play against noobs
when i play duo i get into high matchmaking
when i play 3 4 5 man stacks we always get same as our oponents for example 3+1+1
or 3+2 vs our 4+1 or so
hmmm maybe thats my problem i always play solo....
nah its cool dog.playing solo is much better
29
« on: February 11, 2012, 17:16 »
this is playDOTA forum, you wont achieve anything here
Thats why i asked for a 1v1 ladder in DOTA
|
WiKi
How To
Rules
Ban
Unban
LA Staff
Maps
Streams
Show Posts
