-
lol i just saw this on 9gag and i'm curious what the people on pd think the answer is
(http://d24w6bsrhbeh9d.cloudfront.net/photo/4840184_700b_v1.jpg)
http://9gag.com/gag/4840184
-
99
-
Answer is 288 because brackets are first counted than divide then multiply
-
i also think it's 2 :P
-
i know its 2
-
edit : just try to calculate with a calculator , thx
try to calculate 2+2*2 and on most calculators you will fail...
but i still think the answer is 2 :p
-
= 2 noobs
-
lol i just saw this on 9gag and i'm curious what the people on pd think the answer is
(http://d24w6bsrhbeh9d.cloudfront.net/photo/4840184_700b_v1.jpg)
http://9gag.com/gag/4840184
come check the books im studding now and u will not be able to sleep for 1 week :-\
-
and the answer of this question is 2 for sure
-
Lol i wasn't even thinking, dividing has an advantage over multiplying and brackets are done so it would be 2 if it was like this
48/(2(9+3))
btw gmx you're doing pitagoras theorem? :D
-
simple man
48% 2 ( 9 + 3 ) =
48% 2 ( 12 )
48% 24 = 2
-
Cannot belive in that what I saw here....
(http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/That_6934bd_864413.jpg)
-
For all who answered with 2
(http://artoftrolling.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/chatroulette-trolling-or.jpg)
You trolling, right?
-
Actually it's the right answer 288
-
ontopic post : sucks
-
OMG GUYS the right is 2 dont be noobs omg
look 48%2 ( 9 + 3 )
simply 48 & ( 2 . 9 ) + ( 2 . 3 )
now 48 & 18 + 6
48 & 24 = 2 idiots :D
-
OMG GUYS it is 2 dont be noobs omg
look 48%2 ( 9 + 3 )
simply 48 & ( 2 . 9 ) + ( 2 . 3 )
now 48 & 18 + 6
48 & 24 = 2 idiots :D
-
288 lol...
ofc its 2.
-
288 lol...
ofc its 2.
finally some ppl with brain :D ;D with all respect for other guys ^^
-
As I know ALWAYS, fukken always u msut do in such math ( ) first!!! so the 2(9+3) goes first no matter what.... then you do the rest so 48/24.... not sure if im that stupid or new generation made they own rules....
-
Lol i wasn't even thinking, dividing has an advantage over multiplying and brackets are done so it would be 2 if it was like this
48/(2(9+3))
btw gmx you're doing pitagoras theorem? :D
lol pitagoras theorem i know it from 3 years my books are harder than u expect u want me to take take ss for you to live my night mares ? :D thats why i have you guys without this place i would be in place with crazy and retard ppl :D
-
i asked my professor on uni (advanced math subject) he rofled and told me go to high school year 10 and learn the law of math
ofc brackets first u piece of nolifers xd
buit hey u play u dont need fuckin multiplying or dividing coz u only fuckin add kills by number 1 so yeah u masters!
-
Necroing old troll meme, eh? Fucking with implied multiplication to brainwash people.
Funny thing is, formally both answers are correct. This equation is intentionally badly formed to make it ambigous.
Bit more on topic can be found here. (http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/48293)
EDIT: Goddamn ninjas. FU :P
-
@up
The answer is 2. Trust me, im engineer.
-
apparently drago got german education and all knows german education is limited and poor xd
-
Divide and multiply must be done first, if they are together, we just calculate from left to right.
So
first 48/2=24
and 24*(9+3)=24*12=288
And here is an harder question:
We have 9 marbles, 8 of them is same weight, 1 is a little heavier. We can't understand with hand, but we have an equal arm scale, who can find which marble is heavier in just 2 scales?
-
go make a poll i wanna see how manny ppl think it is 2 lol
just click this
http://lagabuse.com/forum/index.php?action=editpoll;add;topic=107488.0
there you go now vote all
-
Where's "author of that equation sucks at using parenthesis" option? No vote, sorry.
-
Where's "author of that equation sucks at using parenthesis" option? No vote, sorry.
naah it has nothing to do with bad use of parentheses...
it is as it is...
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/48293
and i say 2.
48 / 2 ( 9 + 3 ) =
48
------------------- =
2 ( 9 +3 )
48
------------------=
18 + 6
48
---------------- =
2. 24
well i maybe wrong but that's my opinion .
-
48÷2(9+3) =
48÷2*(9+3)=
48÷(2*12)=
48÷24=
2.
-
lol how is this even a discussion?
ITS 2
-
its not 2, its 288.
-
God thats stupid... if there are double (()) then maybe its 288, but sience you must do () first then only good answer is 2 :|
ps. Maybe not double (()) cause it wont change anything :P
Before you dont POINT to do the 48/2 FIRST.. the answer will be 2.
-
Do any of you got math in high school,elementary school or college i don't know how the fuck you pass it with this shitty knowledge,div.ide is right if you put it this way it can mean both.Anyway the correct answer is 288 done by google calculator,also nevermore if it was double brackets 2 would be correct answer now go to elementary school again
nazarovac you can't simply put 2* in brackets it goes like this
48/2*(12)
24*(12)=288
-
Do any of you got math in high school,elementary school or college i don't know how the fuck you pass it with this shitty knowledge,div.ide is right if you put it this way it can mean both.Anyway the correct answer is 288 done by google calculator,also nevermore if it was double brackets 2 would be correct answer now go to elementary school again
nazarovac you can't simply put 2* in brackets it goes like this
48/2*(12)
24*(12)=288
U are wrong man.
Distributive property of multiplication over addition. Early Algebra problem.
The distributive property of multiplication CLEARLY states that the 2(9+3) is an entire statement and CANNOT be broken up. 2(9+3) follows the distributive property which can be rewritten as (2*9+2*3). Let me repeat the 2 outside of the parenthesis follows the distributive property of multiplication and must be factored and simplified before performing any other operations on it. You do NOT compute this expression from left to right until you use Algebra to simplify the statement 2(9+3).
So this can be rewritten as:
48 / (2*9 + 2*3)
Which leaves us with
48 / 24 = 2
Answer = 2.
-
@up - EXACTLY!
Before you dont POINT to do the 48/2 FIRST.. the answer will be 2
As for me () goes first.... :|
-
till now it's 7 votes for 2 and 7 votes for 288.
hope there will be more voters.
P.S.
you don't need math when you have swag
-
Actually this is the equation you're looking for
48/2*(9+3)
24(9+3)
(9*24+3*24)
Also in math teachers told us to check our answers in equations with x you replace the x if you get different result it means you're wrong so check this without it
48/2*(9+3)
24*12
So those 2 answers can't be correct which means there is a mistake
-
Actually this is the equation you're looking for
48/2*(9+3)
24(9+3)
(9*24+3*24)
Also in math teachers told us to check our answers in equations with x you replace the x if you get different result it means you're wrong so check this without it
48/2*(9+3)
24*12
So those 2 answers can't be correct which means there is a mistake
Actually it's not.
the equation states 48/2(9+3).
u can check on 1.st page of this topic.
-
As div.ide mentioned it can be solved on both ways check his link http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/48293
-
guys come on lets end this stupid Problem :D the answer is 2 End Of Story stop Annoying plz and for ppl who said its 288 its also True But not 100% i mean if u answered this question at some exam with 288 u will not take the question points because as we all know Beating is stronger than the division
so 2 ( 9+ 3 ) before 48 . 2 stop spam here plz i think its clear for all of you now
-
Actually you would lose points on exam if you typed 2 and why should we stop arguing?
-
OMG MAN Beating is stronger than the division as i said before 288 is wrong and wrong and wrong come one how we gonna solve this do we have some math teacher at this forum ? or i call mine now ?
-
OMG MAN Beating is stronger than the division as i said before 288 is wrong and wrong and wrong come one how we gonna solve this do we have some math teacher at this forum ? or i call mine now ?
nah you don't have to call your teacher i will solve it later and explain it all. but for now ,let them vote and discuss...
-
Actually why do we need it since division goes first then multiplying,everyone who i asked(all of them did math in math college said that).If the equation was written like this 48/2*(9+3) 288 would be the right answer
-
man when want to do a calculation and , you have the brackets in equation , u must solve the Brackets Before ANY THING if there was Beating or division b4 the brackets now u got the idea mate ?
-
You solve the brackets ok i'll do it
48/2*(9+3)
48/2*(12)
24*(12)=288 valla
since 2 isn't in brackets
-
Ok Brother i will explain it for you Simply plz read it 1 more time then post
48% 2 ( 9 + 3 ) =
now we leave 48 and solve 2 ( 9 + 3 ) and the way u must solve it is just like this
2 ( 9 + 3 ) = ( 18 + 6 ) Cool ? now its just like this 48% ( 18+6) = 48 % 24 = 2 so u got it now or what?
-
I can assume that there is some ppl who dont know the answer but im sure that some guys here just trolling.
As said many times u should try calculator. The pictures with calculators in link posted few posts upper is confusing. Two calculators show 2 and other 2 show 288. There is one correct answer and it is 288. Owner of calculator witch show 2 should ask his money back. Mathematics is exact science.
48/2*(9+3) firstly brackets 48/2*12
now u can do 48/2*12 = 24*12 = 288
or even 48*12/2 = 576/2 = 288
-
I told you my point of view i wont spam here any more .
-
99
+1
-
(http://i.qkme.me/367d90.jpg)
-
Ok check it out you uber math pros. why arent you just simply doing the fucking thing from left to right . Yeah its right you HAVE do the stuff IN the brackets first , but who said that multiplying the 2 with the (9+3) has priority? So its just like that :
48 / 2 * (9 + 3) = // now you are doing the stuff in the brackets first which is 9+3=12 and you can remove the brackets now , you dont need brackets for a single number.
Then it goes like this :
48/2 * 12 =
and then go either this way 576/2 or this way 24 * 12 .
So no matter if you divide 48 with 2 first and then multiply with 12 or multiply 48 with 12 first and then divide by 2 , you will get 288
Peace I am out
-
I think we must email Steven Hawking with that :P
-
Ok check it out you uber math pros. why arent you just simply doing the fucking thing from left to right . Yeah its right you HAVE do the stuff IN the brackets first , but who said that multiplying the 2 with the (9+3) has priority? So its just like that :
48 / 2 * (9 + 3) = // now you are doing the stuff in the brackets first which is 9+3=12 and you can remove the brackets now , you dont need brackets for a single number.
Then it goes like this :
48/2 * 12 =
and then go either this way 576/2 or this way 24 * 12 .
So no matter if you divide 48 with 2 first and then multiply with 12 or multiply 48 with 12 first and then divide by 2 , you will get 288
Peace I am out
dude did u learn some thing called when u have number before a Brackets and the relation Between this Number and this Bracket is Beat or division u must solve it before any goddamn thing else?
-
On any exam I'd write 2 cause of this:
Try to make it like this:
(I replace 48 with X , and put 2 to try if its correct)
x / 2(9+3) = 2
x / 2(12) = 2
x / 24 = 2
x = 2*24
x = 48 > Correct
Now, i replace 48 with X again , but this time i put right side 288 ( = 288 ) i get :
x / 2(9+3) = 288
x / 2(12) = 288
x / 24 = 288
x = 288*24
x = 6912 > Not correct (not 48)
So, answer is 2. My opinion.
-
On any exam I'd write 2 cause of this:
Try to make it like this:
(I replace 48 with X , and put 2 to try if its correct)
x / 2(9+3) = 2
x / 2(12) = 2
x / 24 = 2
x = 2*24
x = 48 > Correct
Now, i replace 48 with X again , but this time i put right side 288 ( = 288 ) i get :
x / 2(9+3) = 288
x / 2(12) = 288
x / 24 = 288
x = 288*24
x = 6912 > Not correct (not 48)
So, answer is 2. My opinion.
stick to dota
-
On any exam I'd write 2 cause of this:
Try to make it like this:
(I replace 48 with X , and put 2 to try if its correct)
x / 2(9+3) = 2
x / 2(12) = 2
x / 24 = 2
x = 2*24
x = 48 > Correct
Now, i replace 48 with X again , but this time i put right side 288 ( = 288 ) i get :
x / 2(9+3) = 288
x / 2(12) = 288
x / 24 = 288
x = 288*24
x = 6912 > Not correct (not 48)
So, answer is 2. My opinion.
stick to dota
Nah, im imba at mathz also :D
-
Fuck, I had nice wall of text incoming, and erased all by accident. RAGE.
I'll shorten it.
This equation uses informal implied multiplication, which does NOT have strict, formalised rules to follow, and is used here improperly, without proper brackets to clear out ambiguity. Therefore, in my eyes, is nonsense, and both versions are kinda correct. It's like, Schrodinger's math :D
Though meme author was brilliant troll.
So, example. Left to right logic.
Sin (2*pi) = 0 - that's for sure.
But this:
sin 2 pi = sin(2) * pi = definitely not 0
Because who said you are supposed to multiply first? Oh wait, everyone does that. Looks like everyone disobey most basic rules.
See what I did there? I know sine example is somewhat dumb because it's traditional, but there are no formal rules either. Again, use brackets or... (yes it's a link) (http://youtube.com/watch?v=Xw-m4jEY-Ns&feature=player_detailpage#t=70s)
Otherwise it makes no sense.
@below, the fuck did I just read :D
-
You are wrong, Stalker.
Since when 2*(9+3) = 2*(12)?
2*(9+3) = 2*9 + 2*3 = 18 + 6 =24
so,
48 / 24 = 2
end of discussion.
-
You are wrong, Stalker.
Since when 2*(9+3) = 2*(12)?
2*(9+3) = 2*9 + 2*3 = 18 + 6 =24
so,
48 / 24 = 2
end of discussion.
+1 man ty finally some human with brain :D
-
ns
x/2(9+3) = 2
x/2 * 12 = 2
6x = 2
x = 0.333 wrong
x/2(9+3) = 288
x/2 * 12 = 288
6x = 288
x = 48
correct
btw most of you posted it like this 48/2*(9+3) which would make 288 the answer
btw jeandarc 2*9 + 2*3 is same like 2*12
ns just sayin' in case you thougth of the above but if you thought 48/2(9+3) both are correct
btw gmx actually we all have brain and he didn't solve the equation good
-
You are wrong, Stalker.
Since when 2*(9+3) = 2*(12)?
2*(9+3) = 2*9 + 2*3 = 18 + 6 =24
so,
48 / 24 = 2
end of discussion.
Dafuq did i just read
LoL its same :D
2*(9+3) = 2*9 + 2*3
@ kingw3, i said I'd answer 2 , i didnt say 2 is correct. Both answers ( 2 and 288 ) are correct since its not written like it should be.
-
You are wrong, Stalker.
Since when 2*(9+3) = 2*(12)?
2*(9+3) = 2*9 + 2*3 = 18 + 6 =24
so,
48 / 24 = 2
end of discussion.
Dafuq did i just read
LoL its same :D
2*(9+3) = 2*9 + 2*3
Edit : XDDDDDDDD
-
i was about to edit my post after 30 sec cuz i noticed that it's the same, but fuck it xd
-
Ok guys, since we cant agree on this, lets ask Einstein
(http://i46.tinypic.com/n5r1y1.jpg)
-
Ok guys, since we cant agree on this, lets ask Einstein
(http://i46.tinypic.com/n5r1y1.jpg)
LOL NO Gj for me i explained 1st about this :'( :'( and u say gj Stalker ;D
-
Ok trolls how do you say it Irak or Iran????
wtf
-
Ok guys, since we cant agree on this, lets ask Einstein
(http://i46.tinypic.com/n5r1y1.jpg)
LOL NO Gj for me i explained 1st about this :'( :'( and u say gj Stalker ;D
Yeah, but i gave him ninja vouch in IHRL! ;D
@zxcv Point of this whole topic is trolling , question is trolling :D
-
Ok guys, since we cant agree on this, lets ask Einstein
(http://i46.tinypic.com/n5r1y1.jpg)
LOL NO Gj for me i explained 1st about this :'( :'( and u say gj Stalker ;D
Yeah, but i gave him ninja vouch in IHRL! ;D
ahhahahahahahah + 1
-
IT IS #$%& TWOO.
ANOTHER WAY TO SOLVE IT:
48/2(9+3)
48/ (2*9+2*3)
48/ (18+6)
48/24
2
-
nahhh its 288 for sure .
just treat it all like a fraction
so this 48÷2(9+3) is like this 48/2 * (9+3) and result is 288.
but in case that the problem would be like this 48÷ [ 2 (9+3) ] the fraction would look like this :
48 / 2(9+3) (so in this case 2(9+3) is under 48 in the fraction ) and the answer would be 2.
but since its not , the result is 288.
-
You are wrong, Stalker.
Since when 2*(9+3) = 2*(12)?
2*(9+3) = 2*9 + 2*3 = 18 + 6 =24
so,
48 / 24 = 2
end of discussion.
Hmmm... :D
(http://www.straferight.com/forums/attachments/shooters/19692d1320857459-mw3-pc-release-not-sure-if-trolling-just-stupid.jpg)
-
nahhh its 288 for sure .
just treat it all like a fraction
so this 48÷2(9+3) is like this 48/2 * (9+3) and result is 288.
but in case that the problem would be like this 48÷ [ 2 (9+3) ] the fraction would look like this :
48 / 2(9+3) (so in this case 2(9+3) is under 48 in the fraction ) and the answer would be 2.
but since its not , the result is 288.
one does simply not separate ''2(9+3)'' !
-
lol there si no trolling and there are no two answers for this
i mean this is just adding multiplying and dividing so you only can have 1 answer not two or more.
-
Lolz nabs can't admit their mistake it's 2 and 288 if the fraction was 2* than it would be 288
btw samir well implied multiplying is not defined good enough read div.ide's(smartest guy here) link
-
Ah i got it it is 2. At last....
Exactly 144 times
-
Lolz nabs can't admit their mistake it's 2 and 288 if the fraction was 2* than it would be 288
btw samir well implied multiplying is not defined good enough read div.ide's(smartest guy here) link
i just explained the fraction thing but i didnt know how to draw a fraction so i did it the classic way with the /
-
Ah i got it it is 2. At last....
Exactly 144 times
just remember that :
I dont want onions on my Big Mac.
-
(http://static.pokato.net/2010-11-20-20-17-3289041481.jpg)
-
Ah i got it it is 2. At last....
Exactly 144 times
just remember that :
I dont want onions on my Big Mac.
U wont be able to afford it.
-
U guys really suck at maths huh xD Its obvious that the answer is 288
48/2(9+3)
red should be done first.
=48/2*12
and then, just go from left to right.
=24*12
=288
You CANT start from right to left, u must calculate from left to right. IF it was
48/(2[9+3]) it will be 2, because of paranthesis. But there is NOT.
-
I thought gamers were good at math but this is just sad, fifth grade math.
-
I stilll laughz for some people stupidy :D
Not sure if people these days making fun, trolling or have lack in theyr head :D
Ps. Gj all who voted for obvious 2 lol. I still got faith in humanity ;D
-
The distributive property of multiplication CLEARLY states that the 2(9+3) is an entire statement and CANNOT be broken up. 2(9+3) follows the distributive property which can be rewritten as (2*9+2*3). Let me repeat the 2 outside of the parenthesis follows the distributive property of multiplication and must be factored and simplified before performing any other operations on it. You do NOT compute this expression from left to right until you use Algebra to simplify the statement 2(9+3).
So this can be rewritten as:
48 / (2*9 + 2*3).
Which leaves us with.
48 / 24 = 2.
Answer = 2.
Lastly for those using Google or any other online calculator. These do not understand many theorems or properties so you must explicitly explain what you mean. There is a difference between 48 / 2 * (9+3) and 48 / 2(9+3). The first notation reads 48 / 2 * 1(9+3) while the second reads 48 / (2*9+2*3). Be very careful with your signs.
I was too lazy to write it myself so yeah i copy pasted..
-
So Noobs When your Master of math says its 2 then its 2 Like A boSS ::) ::) 8) 8) 8)
-
At first I thought it's 288, then when I think a little bit better, it's 2 :D
-
Lets play a game to solve this problem . Answer 2 team vs. answer 288 team. The winning teams answer will be correct and no discussion any more
-
Lets play a game to solve this problem . Answer 2 team vs. answer 288 team. The winning teams answer will be correct and no discussion any more
Agree :D
-
I think the ones that voted "2" should get special Math icon ;D ;D ;D
-
I think the ones that voted "2" should get special Math icon ;D ;D ;D
+1 xD
Lets play a game to solve this problem . Answer 2 team vs. answer 288 team. The winning teams answer will be correct and no discussion any more
+1, but aint fear team 2 have stalker :)
-
I think the ones that voted "2" should get special Math icon ;D ;D ;D
here you go:
(https://encrypted-tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQRzyBa6QGbYSOKbU5B4Ik8wd-zoUoV8fILRPu09shltUY3bNHiVEfm3XF8)
-
Lets play a game to solve this problem . Answer 2 team vs. answer 288 team. The winning teams answer will be correct and no discussion any more
+1, but aint fear team 2 have stalker :)
You mean Night^^Stalker, the PD noob no.1? :)
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpBZEndU3oc
-
I like the 'game' idea , who is with me in '2' team? :D
-
simple man
48% 2 ( 9 + 3 ) =
48% 2 ( 12 )
48% 24 = 2
correct.
u dont have to be genious to know this xD
but im good at math anyways,allways 10 at every math object at university
-
Everyone who thinks is 288, should simply reconsider of revisiting the elementary school mathematics.
-
Lets play a game to solve this problem . Answer 2 team vs. answer 288 team. The winning teams answer will be correct and no discussion any more
+1, but aint fear team 2 have stalker :)
You mean Night^^Stalker, the PD noob no.1? :)
No i am in 288 team, the math pros team xD
-
I like the 'game' idea , who is with me in '2' team? :D
im with u for ever :D ;D ;D ;D ;D
-
Everyone who thinks is 288, should simply reconsider of revisiting the elementary school mathematics.
Actually everyone who said 2 should reconsider of revisiting the elementary school mathematics
Since you go from left to right this would be 2 48/[2(9+3)]
phu thai you're getting rather 5 maybe 10 from theory but for tasks same for gmx ask any professor,teacher etc
You simply can't do any math task without order of operations and by it answer is 288
-
...
I really got sick of those guys there talking about math, universities and how u are good at math.
Half of u there are 16-17 years old and havent even graduated yet.
Go sleep clever guys
-
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=48%C3%B72%289%2B3%29+%3D
simply first ( ) -> 48/2*12 =
then all operations have same priority so we go from left to the right
= 24*12 = 288
this is problem because not all math pros arent agreed if 2(2+2) has priority over 2*(2+2)
but most of them say simply 2(2+2)=2*(2+2) so they say it has no priority
END OF STORY
-
Rofl it is 288. I dont know why people get confused with this so much.
Oh now i see ... Need to think about this again.
-
lol guys u dont have any idea what are u talking about.i am 21 years,3rd year at tehnic university,learn mathlab then post here
-
If i remember this right :
1. 9+3 (This is true meaning of ''Doing Brackets first'' , not all which is connected to them , just inside the brackets )
2. Division 48/2 is 24
3. 24 x 12 is 288 and it is my final answer.
-
If i remember this right :
1. 9+3 (This is true meaning of ''Doing Brackets first'' , not all which is connected to them , just inside the brackets )
right.
opperation order (* is before /)
reconsider.
-
man yes u must beat the number 2 with the Bracket then u continue calculating it
-
And why that?
Rule is simple , first brackets BUT ONLY whats is inside of them . Then goes division , no matter what , and then you multiply. You think just because 2 stands along the brackets it should go that way. Anyone who has done proper math will say that division goes first no matter what , and rule for brackets , as i said is onyl for what is the brackets.
-
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110427155042AACb7d8
-
Rule 1: First perform any calculations inside parentheses.
Rule 2: Next perform all multiplications and divisions, working from left to right.
Rule 3: Lastly, perform all additions and subtractions, working from left to right.
elementary school
-
Rule 1: First perform any calculations inside parentheses.
Rule 2: Next perform all multiplications and divisions, working from left to right.
Rule 3: Lastly, perform all additions and subtractions, working from left to right.
elementary school
This is only thing that bothers me and which i cant remember correctly.
-
And why that?
Rule is simple , first brackets BUT ONLY
if u saw 1st brackets then why dafaq ppl still think that the answer is 288?
48/ 2 ( 9 + 3 )
48/ ( 18 + 6 )
48/ 24 = 2
-
I said 2x times.
Brackets rule applies for things ONLY INSIDE the brackets. You cant say that
48 / (2x(9+3) and 48/2x(9+3) is same thing.
-
"working from left to right" is for those who didnt passed on math
EDIT: nvm,ill come tommorow with full explanation if i have time
-
"working from left to right" is for those who didnt passed on math
Still it is the rule in math. And it is logic that you do left to right , like the way you read ( there are exceptions in arabic )
I see that king wrote same thing
Lol i wasn't even thinking, dividing has an advantage over multiplying and brackets are done so it would be 2 if it was like this
48/(2(9+3))
btw gmx you're doing pitagoras theorem? :D
-
"working from left to right" is for those who didnt passed on math
Still it is the rule in math. And it is logic that you do left to right , like the way you read ( there are exceptions in arabic )
ofc man,working from left to right is true,but also apply that with working with correct opperation order
-
You say that first you multiply then you divide ?
-
ofc man,basics mathlab knowlage
-
From what i learned , it was always divide. Btw , you cant compare programs and real life , it is not really same thing even it looks like.
-
From left to right? what the hell you tlaking about....
Take first elemntary book and you see that in this math you have to do () first... sicne 2 stands before () means you must multiply every single sign inside the () with 2 ..
-
From left to right? what the hell you tlaking about....
Take first elemntary book and you see that in this math you have to do () first... sicne 2 stands before () means you must multiply every single sign inside the () with 2 ..
YES
-
You say that first you multiply then you divide ?
YES this is the part they couldn't understand, 2(12)=2*12 is multiplication, so it must be done before the 48/.
From left to right? what the hell you tlaking about....
Take first elemntary book and you see that in this math you have to do () first... sicne 2 stands before () means you must multiply every single sign inside the () with 2 ..
and this is true, it works from left to right. and we already do the operation in () first, then, remaining operations are multiply and divide, they are same priority so go from left to right.
-
Anyone Learnt PEDMAS It goes like this
terms inside parentheses or brackets
exponents and roots
multiplication and division
addition and subtraction
which means multiplication and division have same priority(same as exponents and root and addition and substraction)
Which means Divide and multiply are in same order you do it from left to right
About those things in elementary school it goes like this
2(9+3) = (2*9+3*2)
but in this case 48/2(9+3)
24(9+3)
(9*24+3*24)
-
Anyone Learnt PEDMAS It goes like this
terms inside parentheses or brackets
exponents and roots
multiplication and division
addition and subtraction
which means multiplication and division have same priority(same as exponents and root and addition and substraction)
Which means Divide and multiply are in same order you do it from left to right
About those things in elementary school it goes like this
2(9+3) = (2*9+3*2)
but in this case 48/2(9+3)
24(9+3)
(9*24+3*24)
heretic!!!!!
-
I'm heretic for telling the truth there is a article in wikipedia about pedmas which proves that the solution is 288,it's not my fault people are still in elementary school or that they don't know simplest rule
...
I really got sick of those guys there talking about math, universities and how u are good at math.
Half of u there are 16-17 years old and havent even graduated yet.
Go sleep clever guys
I agree with him
ma znam zajebavam se i ja nego cisto ih naucim malo mate :P
btw in that case 2x/2x would be x on square and not 1
-
even though im not sure what the answer is couse im outrolled, i voted for 2... all your calculations make some logic....
"im just kidding king, šta ja znam, ja sam prof fizičke kulture :D :D
-
It seems like my previous explanation was not enough for u guys, ill try to make it easier for u guys to understand why answer is 2.
So lets think of the number 24; 24 = 18+6 right?
Now lets write "18+6" in parenthesis of 2 which leads us to 2(9+3)
Now if you have completed elementary school you should be able to understand that 2(9+3) is an entire statement and it CANNOT be broken up.
So lets get back to 48/2(9+3)
2(9+3) = 24
48/24 = 2
I hope everyone can uderstand now. In this case Left to right thing doesnt work.
-
2(9+3) is fuckin sentence in math language
when space between 2 and "( means automatically as multplying factor when it comes to further calculations
therefore u leave 48 dividing "that sentence" at the end of fuckin calculations which means fuckin
48/24
so far i saw all noobs in dota said 288 xDD
so yeah stick to school not dota plz.
-
@up
+1, definitely.
-
= 2
I hope everyone can uderstand now. In this case Left to right thing doesnt work.
and thats end
-
48÷2(9+3)
so simple, yet so hard to solve
-
48÷2(9+3)
so simple, yet so hard to solve
FINALLY :D
-
I'm heretic for telling the truth there is a article in wikipedia about pedmas which proves that the solution is 288,it's not my fault people are still in elementary school or that they don't know simplest rule...
I really got sick of those guys there talking about math, universities and how u are good at math.
Half of u there are 16-17 years old and havent even graduated yet.
Go sleep clever guys
I agree with him
ma znam zajebavam se i ja nego cisto ih naucim malo mate :P
btw in that case 2x/2x would be x on square and not 1
+1
Google says its 288 , wikipedia says its 288 , I say its 288.
So its fucking 288
-
It seems like my previous explanation was not enough for u guys, ill try to make it easier for u guys to understand why answer is 2.
So lets think of the number 24; 24 = 18+6 right?
Now lets write "18+6" in parenthesis of 2 which leads us to 2(9+3)
Now if you have completed elementary school you should be able to understand that 2(9+3) is an entire statement and it CANNOT be broken up.
So lets get back to 48/2(9+3)
2(9+3) = 24
48/24 = 2
I hope everyone can uderstand now. In this case Left to right thing doesnt work.
that's not an explanation.
number 24 can be wrote down as a 48/2 which is also part of equatiation.
Also 48/2 can be written down as a 48x0.5
so there should be no talking about priorites in dividing and multiplying.
-
On any exam I'd write 2 cause of this:
Try to make it like this:
(I replace 48 with X , and put 2 to try if its correct)
x / 2(9+3) = 2
x / 2(12) = 2
x / 24 = 2
x = 2*24
x = 48 > Correct
Now, i replace 48 with X again , but this time i put right side 288 ( = 288 ) i get :
x / 2(9+3) = 288
x / 2(12) = 288
x / 24 = 288
x = 288*24
x = 6912 > Not correct (not 48)
END OF STORY
-
On any exam I'd write 2 cause of this:
Try to make it like this:
(I replace 48 with X , and put 2 to try if its correct)
x / 2(9+3) = 2
x / 2(12) = 2
x / 24 = 2
x = 2*24
x = 48 > Correct
Now, i replace 48 with X again , but this time i put right side 288 ( = 288 ) i get :
x / 2(9+3) = 288
x / 2(12) = 288
x / 24 = 288
x = 288*24
x = 6912 > Not correct (not 48)
END OF STORY
so why wouldnt you divide x (48) with 2 first ?
-
Well try to find on good term - Order of operations and maybe you will be smarter :P
-
(http://i1098.photobucket.com/albums/g374/RezartLacostaHD/Capture-9.png)
but Google made this kind of calculation 48 ( 9 +3 )
---------------
48 2
while should be -------------------
2 ( 9 +3 )
-
On any exam I'd write 2 cause of this:
Try to make it like this:
(I replace 48 with X , and put 2 to try if its correct)
x / 2(9+3) = 2
x / 2(12) = 2
x / 24 = 2
x = 2*24
x = 48 > Correct
Now, i replace 48 with X again , but this time i put right side 288 ( = 288 ) i get :
x / 2(9+3) = 288
x / 2(12) = 288
x / 24 = 288
x = 288*24
x = 6912 > Not correct (not 48)
END OF STORY
so why wouldnt you divide x (48) with 2 first ?
again, that is not an explanation
-
It seems like my previous explanation was not enough for u guys, ill try to make it easier for u guys to understand why answer is 2.
So lets think of the number 24; 24 = 18+6 right?
Now lets write "18+6" in parenthesis of 2 which leads us to 2(9+3)
Now if you have completed elementary school you should be able to understand that 2(9+3) is an entire statement and it CANNOT be broken up.
So lets get back to 48/2(9+3)
2(9+3) = 24
48/24 = 2
I hope everyone can uderstand now. In this case Left to right thing doesnt work.
that's not an explanation.
number 24 can be wrote down as a 48/2 which is also part of equatiation.
Also 48/2 can be written down as a 48x0.5
so there should be no talking about priorites in dividing and multiplying.
Do you even understand? 2(9+3) is an entire statement which CANNOT BE BROKEN UP
Edit: Oh and also lets try your way, lets write 24 as 48/2
= 48/48/2
= 48.2/48
= 2
I hope this was simple enough for you.
-
It seems like my previous explanation was not enough for u guys, ill try to make it easier for u guys to understand why answer is 2.
So lets think of the number 24; 24 = 18+6 right?
Now lets write "18+6" in parenthesis of 2 which leads us to 2(9+3)
Now if you have completed elementary school you should be able to understand that 2(9+3) is an entire statement and it CANNOT be broken up.
So lets get back to 48/2(9+3)
2(9+3) = 24
48/24 = 2
I hope everyone can uderstand now. In this case Left to right thing doesnt work.
that's not an explanation.
number 24 can be wrote down as a 48/2 which is also part of equatiation.
Also 48/2 can be written down as a 48x0.5
so there should be no talking about priorites in dividing and multiplying.
Do you even understand? 2(9+3) is an entire statement which CANNOT BE BROKEN UP
Edit: Oh and also lets try your way, lets write 24 as 48/2
= 48/48/2
= 48.2/48
= 2
I hope this was simple enough for you.
NOT TRUE MAN. the 2 before (9+3) may very well be seperated , and in this cause it has to be cause its in division with 48.
-
lol you all get confused whike using /
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2 *(9+3)
48 ÷ 2 * 12
but you all use
48/2(9+3) and fuck everything up....
-
Jesus people, thats not funny anymore.. You are world morons if you dont udnerstand this:
2(9+3) is an entire statement which CANNOT BE BROKEN UP
Stop making loosers from yourself for god sake.....
-
It seems like my previous explanation was not enough for u guys, ill try to make it easier for u guys to understand why answer is 2.
So lets think of the number 24; 24 = 18+6 right?
Now lets write "18+6" in parenthesis of 2 which leads us to 2(9+3)
Now if you have completed elementary school you should be able to understand that 2(9+3) is an entire statement and it CANNOT be broken up.
So lets get back to 48/2(9+3)
2(9+3) = 24
48/24 = 2
I hope everyone can uderstand now. In this case Left to right thing doesnt work.
that's not an explanation.
number 24 can be wrote down as a 48/2 which is also part of equatiation.
Also 48/2 can be written down as a 48x0.5
so there should be no talking about priorites in dividing and multiplying.
Do you even understand? 2(9+3) is an entire statement which CANNOT BE BROKEN UP
Edit: Oh and also lets try your way, lets write 24 as 48/2
= 48/48/2
= 48.2/48
= 2
I hope this was simple enough for you.
NOT TRUE MAN. the 2 before (9+3) may very well be seperated , and in this cause it has to be cause its in division with 48.
2(9+3) can be written as (2*9+2*3); 2(9+3) is a math sentence an entire statement breaking it up is same as breaking normal sentences its like You want to write "I am going to play dota" but you write it down as "I going play dota"
-
It seems like my previous explanation was not enough for u guys, ill try to make it easier for u guys to understand why answer is 2.
So lets think of the number 24; 24 = 18+6 right?
Now lets write "18+6" in parenthesis of 2 which leads us to 2(9+3)
Now if you have completed elementary school you should be able to understand that 2(9+3) is an entire statement and it CANNOT be broken up.
So lets get back to 48/2(9+3)
2(9+3) = 24
48/24 = 2
I hope everyone can uderstand now. In this case Left to right thing doesnt work.
that's not an explanation.
number 24 can be wrote down as a 48/2 which is also part of equatiation.
Also 48/2 can be written down as a 48x0.5
so there should be no talking about priorites in dividing and multiplying.
Do you even understand? 2(9+3) is an entire statement which CANNOT BE BROKEN UP
Edit: Oh and also lets try your way, lets write 24 as 48/2
= 48/48/2
= 48.2/48
= 2
I hope this was simple enough for you.
NOT TRUE MAN. the 2 before (9+3) may very well be seperated , and in this cause it has to be cause its in division with 48.
2(9+3) can be written as (2*9+2*3); 2(9+3) is a math sentence an entire statement breaking it up is same as breaking normal sentences its like You want to write "I am going to play dota" but you write it down as "I going play dota"
I am 24 dude , and i know math for sure . But your view of this is wrong , 2(9+3) is not an entire statement. if the problem would be written like that 48/ [2(9+3)] then 2(9+3) would be an entire statement
-
It seems like my previous explanation was not enough for u guys, ill try to make it easier for u guys to understand why answer is 2.
So lets think of the number 24; 24 = 18+6 right?
Now lets write "18+6" in parenthesis of 2 which leads us to 2(9+3)
Now if you have completed elementary school you should be able to understand that 2(9+3) is an entire statement and it CANNOT be broken up.
So lets get back to 48/2(9+3)
2(9+3) = 24
48/24 = 2
I hope everyone can uderstand now. In this case Left to right thing doesnt work.
that's not an explanation.
number 24 can be wrote down as a 48/2 which is also part of equatiation.
Also 48/2 can be written down as a 48x0.5
so there should be no talking about priorites in dividing and multiplying.
Do you even understand? 2(9+3) is an entire statement which CANNOT BE BROKEN UP
Edit: Oh and also lets try your way, lets write 24 as 48/2
= 48/48/2
= 48.2/48
= 2
I hope this was simple enough for you.
NOT TRUE MAN. the 2 before (9+3) may very well be seperated , and in this cause it has to be cause its in division with 48.
2(9+3) can be written as (2*9+2*3); 2(9+3) is a math sentence an entire statement breaking it up is same as breaking normal sentences its like You want to write "I am going to play dota" but you write it down as "I going play dota"
I am 24 dude , and i know math for sure . But your view of this is wrong , 2(9+3) is not an entire statement. if the problem would be written like that 48/ [2(9+3)] then 2(9+3) would be an entire statement
+1 to everything he says, i am tired to have debate around elementary school math problem
P.S. thing like a sentence and a statement don't exist in math, statement do but has nothing to do w/ this things.
-
/ is used as divide and if it's written like this 48/2*(9+3) = 288
On exam you would get above example and the answer would be 288 but in this case answer can also be 2
It can be broke but as i said above writing 2(9+3) can also be considered as [2*(9+3)] in which case the result would be 2
btw tyger 48/2(9+3) can't be wrote like this 48/(9*2+3*2) it can be written like (9*24+3*24)
-
Now if you have completed elementary school you should be able to understand that 2(9+3) is an entire statement and it CANNOT be broken up.
So lets get back to 48/2(9+3)
2(9+3) = 24
48/24 = 2
Why don't u first divide the 48 to 2 then multiply with that (9+3)=12? the paranthesis musn't make u give pesmission in the operations which is OUTSIDE the paranthesis, so 48/2(9+3)=48/2*12, this is the part you are wrong, its NOT 48/(2*12) so you CANT do that multiplication first, you must divide, then multiplicate. Lets make this even easier looking for you.
(http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/6483/adszqcr.png)
Actually, that paranthesis does not mean anything in this calculation, just write 12 instead of (9+3) and see the fact.
-
courier power ure right,even u writed as a fraction look here:
we have this fraction ok?48/2 and its multiplyed by 12 (9+3)
we reduce terms 12 with 2 and it remains 48*6=288
so i was wrong.also 12 can be written as 24/2
and if u make 48/2*24/2 will be same as 24*12 wich is 288.
so here is the demostration.
-
answer 288.
ask your teacher( in assumption you are studing). if he/she says somthing else, he/she is completly retard:)
-
I need someone to make "multiply" account, so we could argue who's more important :D
Now if you have completed elementary school you should be able to understand that 2(9+3) is an entire statement and it CANNOT be broken up.
So lets get back to 48/2(9+3)
2(9+3) = 24
48/24 = 2
Why don't u first divide the 48 to 2 then multiply with that (9+3)=12? the paranthesis musn't make u give pesmission in the operations which is OUTSIDE the paranthesis, so 48/2(9+3)=48/2*12, this is the part you are wrong, its NOT 48/(2*12) so you CANT do that multiplication first, you must divide, then multiplicate. Lets make this even easier looking for you.
(http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/6483/adszqcr.png)
Actually, that paranthesis does not mean anything in this calculation, just write 12 instead of (9+3) and see the fact.
Could you please solve this:
sin2pi = ?
-
sin2pi=0
but it's mostly used when there is an variable like x or y or even pi but when it's with numbers it should be treated like 2*(9+3) but that isn't 100% right it can also be 2(9+3) as entire statement as said above
-
lol you all get confused whike using /
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2 *(9+3)
48 ÷ 2 * 12
but you all use
48/2(9+3) and fuck everything up....
MAN what did they teach u in ur school ?
-
sin2pi=0
but it's mostly used when there is an variable like x or y or even pi but when it's with numbers it should be treated like 2*(9+3) but that isn't 100% right it can also be 2(9+3) as entire statement as said above
So, pi is not a number anymore?
Hey, I wanted him to evaluate this, to see him contradicting himself.
-
pi is a number but it's treated like a degree here,i will wait till he comments than we shall countinue :D with arguing muhahah
-
i don't get u guys
can u pls solve this for me
8 ÷ 4 * 2 =
how much is it
and about this shit with pi
sin (2*pi) = 0 in degrees in radian it's the same
if you take pi=180 degrees or pi=3.14 in radian it is the same fucking thing sin (2*pi)=0
sin(2* pi) in degrees = sin(2*180)=sin(360)= 0
sin(2*pi) in radian = sin(2*3.14)=sin(6.28)= 0
-
i don't get u guys
can u pls solve this for me
8 ÷ 4 * 2 =
how much is it
and about this shit with pi
sin (2*pi) = 0 in degrees in radian it's the same
if you take pi=180 degrees or pi=3.14 in radian it is the same fucking thing sin (2*pi)=0
sin(2* pi) in degrees = sin(2*180)=sin(360)= 0
sin(2*pi) in radian = sin(2*3.14)=sin(6.28)= 0
Soooooooooooooo
2(9+3) turns into 2 * (9+3) //no parenthesis
but
2pi turns into (2*pi) // inside parenthesis?
Tell me where's sense of it, when you claim implied multiplication has no special precedence, then violate this rule in your very next sentence?
I wrote
sin2pi
you calculated
sin(2pi)
Where did you get this parenthesis from? You claim there should be none, yet you put it.
And no, this is not about difference about degrees and radians. I's about doing it from left to right.
-
i don't get u guys
can u pls solve this for me
8 ÷ 4 * 2 =
how much is it
and about this shit with pi
sin (2*pi) = 0 in degrees in radian it's the same
if you take pi=180 degrees or pi=3.14 in radian it is the same fucking thing sin (2*pi)=0
sin(2* pi) in degrees = sin(2*180)=sin(360)= 0
sin(2*pi) in radian = sin(2*3.14)=sin(6.28)= 0
And do you know the usage of ( ) ?
BEcause when Im reading your posts I think you dont udenrstand that.
-
GG THERE IS JUST NO WAY TO ARGUE WITH SOME OF YOU GUYS
the answer is 99 as xmany said
-
GG? Why don't you just explain why do you use the same, implied multiuplication in two borderline different ways?
In case you still didn't get sie sine thingy - it's quite obvious that we do stuff from left to right, agreed?
So, you claim we undoubtly interpret xy as x * y
Let's do it for sine thingy, we'll get
sin2*pi
Now we do it from left to right. Sine of 2 (radians) is approximately 0.909297427 (https://www.google.pl/search?q=sin+2), multiplied by pi it should give you 2.85664212 [google] (https://www.google.pl/#hl=pl&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=sin+2+*+pi) [wolfram] (http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sin2*pi&dataset=) which is... not quite 0. (clicky clicky numbers will link you to Google The Holy Grail of Maths and Wolfram The Oracle of Maths, in case you wanted to check how I calculated these numbers).
Now convince me that without doubt 2(9+3) turns into 2 * (9+3) and not (2 * (9+3)). There is doubt. It's not defined clearly enough. It leaves interpretation up to you, allowing both answers to be correct UNLESS everyone agrees to create a set in stone rule, which will not likely happen.
So, clarify your maths with proper usage of brackets, or... (yes, it's a link). (http://youtube.com/watch?v=Xw-m4jEY-Ns&feature=player_detailpage#t=70s)
-
GG? Why don't you just explain why do you use the same, implied multiuplication in two borderline different ways?
In case you still didn't get sie sine thingy - it's quite obvious that we do stuff from left to right, agreed?
So, you claim we undoubtly interpret xy as x * y
Let's do it for sine thingy, we'll get
sin2*pi
Now we do it from left to right. Sine of 2 (radians) is approximately 0.909297427 (https://www.google.pl/search?q=sin+2), multiplied by pi it should give you 2.85664212 [google] (https://www.google.pl/#hl=pl&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=sin+2+*+pi) [wolfram] (http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sin2*pi&dataset=) which is... not quite 0. (clicky clicky numbers will link you to Google The Holy Grail of Maths and Wolfram The Oracle of Maths, in case you wanted to check how I calculated these numbers).
Now convince me that without doubt 2(9+3) turns into 2 * (9+3) and not (2 * (9+3)). There is doubt. It's not defined clearly enough. It leaves interpretation up to you, allowing both answers to be correct UNLESS everyone agrees to create a set in stone rule, which will not likely happen.
So, clarify your maths with proper usage of brackets, or... (yes, it's a link). (http://youtube.com/watch?v=Xw-m4jEY-Ns&feature=player_detailpage#t=70s)
You just cant compare sin(2pi) with 2(9+3) . Fractions and multiplikations of pi are always treated as a whole. And if you apply sine to them you MUST write it in brackets like sin(2pi) or sin(pi/4).
Beside that , sine is a FUNCTION , not an operation like multiplikation or substraction. You cant write a function f(x+2)=y like f(x) + f(2) = y, cause functions apply to the stuff in the brackets as a whole.
Dont talk about things you dont have a clue about , better go bust some myths.
-
Pi is a number as well as (9+3). What gives pi special status? Why there's a difference between 2(pi) and 2(9+3) or 2(12), other than value in brackets? You claim there is a rule for that, while there's none. Precedence of implied multiplication varies by source, there's no consensus in that matter. You can't simply use it as it was fundamental.
You cant write a function f(x+2)=y like f(x) + f(2) = y, cause functions apply to the stuff in the brackets as a whole.
Where did you find this? Because it was nowhere in my post. Don't make up statements out of nowhere.
Functions apply to what's in bracket, correct. But where's bracket? Right, traditionally we assume it's here -> (2pi), because otherwise you could just write down sin2 * pi and everything would be clear and done lef to to right. (It's still assumption, though, because brackets are not written.)
Then by what rule same logic is not appliable here? You could simply write down multiplication explicitly, and no one would argue with it then. But now, it's either just an error, a misspelling which in first place makes it stupid to even consider the problem, or it's put like this intentionally, which supposedly means something. I ask you - what makes you belive it's supposed to be understood that way and not the other one? Any written rule you can quote? Or just your opinion? Because latter one is in no way arbitrary here.
I can give you another example with indentical issue:
6/2x
If you make x=3, how much will it be?
For me, it's like writing "i help uncle jack off the horse" without punctiation or capital letters. You're guessing the meaning, and can't be sure what did author really mean, because of those little details.
-
how could this crap could evolve in to this much discusion?
-
stop this math crap, i posted a myth of the week :P
-
6/2x
If you make x=3, how much will it be?
9 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
-
6/2x
If you make x=3, how much will it be?
6/23 possible because no one says "2x" is not a 2 digit value :D
-
result is over 9000. End of story
-
2
-
288
-
its 288
-
hahahahha
-
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=48%C3%B72%289%2B3%29+%3D
simply first ( ) -> 48/2*12 =
then all operations have same priority so we go from left to the right
= 24*12 = 288
this is problem because not all math pros arent agreed if 2(2+2) has priority over 2*(2+2)
but most of them say simply 2(2+2)=2*(2+2) so they say it has no priority
END OF STORY
let me just repeat this. wolphram alpha is the most advanced math and physics program and proves what i said. how can you not understand this easy shit
-
so whats d solution? :o
-
2 & 288(no i'm not kidding)
-
I voted 2,and thought 2.. but after debate with my buddies seems its 288. mainly because after u solve that enclosure u go from left to right,and not multiplying the enc. result with 2.
-
matrix
-
2
-
Omg, not this shit again ;D ;D
-
2 26 (65%)
288 14 (35%)
(http://files-cdn.formspring.me/photos/20120630/n4fef6c6e3655f.png)
-
Not sure if "are you kidding me" because so much ppl voted for wrong answer (288) or you think the correct answer is 288 ;D
-
Not sure if "are you kidding me" because so much ppl voted for wrong answer (288) or you think the correct answer is 288 ;D
I KNOW that correct answer is 288 :D
-
Not sure if "are you kidding me" because so much ppl voted for wrong answer (288) or you think the correct answer is 288 ;D
I KNOW that correct answer is 288 :D
Yeah that's the point: a math pro doesn't think, he knows.
-
Math pro does NEVER write things down like this to begin with.
Also
(http://media.playdota.com/items/104/icon.jpg)
-
If it was this 48:2(9+3) it would be 288 but since it is 48÷2(9+3) the answer is 2
BTW 48÷ (a guy with a dick in his hands), 2(9+3) (a guy with a lazy eye and only 1 ear) so the answer is 2 gay guys and again the answer contains 2 so the answer is 2 def!
-
If it was this 48:2(9+3) it would be 288 but since it is 48÷2(9+3) the answer is 2
BTW 48÷ (a guy with a dick in his hands), 2(9+3) (a guy with a lazy eye and only 1 ear) so the answer is 2 gay guys and again the answer contains 2 so the answer is 2 def!
1+
-
If it was this 48:2(9+3) it would be 288 but since it is 48÷2(9+3) the answer is 2
BTW 48÷ (a guy with a dick in his hands), 2(9+3) (a guy with a lazy eye and only 1 ear) so the answer is 2 gay guys and again the answer contains 2 so the answer is 2 def!
1+
Pls give him someone banana already.... or any kind of fruit
-
If it was this 48:2(9+3) it would be 288 but since it is 48÷2(9+3) the answer is 2
BTW 48÷ (a guy with a dick in his hands), 2(9+3) (a guy with a lazy eye and only 1 ear) so the answer is 2 gay guys and again the answer contains 2 so the answer is 2 def!
there were explanations, but this is just madness
-
If it was this 48:2(9+3) it would be 288 but since it is 48÷2(9+3) the answer is 2
First we calculate the (). so 48:2*(9+3)=48:2*12
Since * and : have the same priotiry we do the calculation placed at the left so : = 24*12=288
-
If it was this 48:2(9+3) it would be 288 but since it is 48÷2(9+3) the answer is 2
First we calculate the (). so 48:2*(9+3)=48:2*12
Since * and : have the same priotiry we do the calculation placed at the left so : = 24*12=288
This is wrong, this is just something accepted to be like. But many mathematicians disagree.