New Rule "if u wanna host u need 50+ games played"

[Rocka]

I would say something totally different than the question was if I know someone alse was right too.
nuff said

[MaNiaC]

I would say something totally different than the question was if I know someone alse was right too.
nuff said

I said this because this would continue in the infinite. I wont debate whit u.

[DuffMan]

Guys This is public Bot , Not need 50+ games for Hosting . I wont it. Not believe that it would be so much games like now . I think that would be most "Pro games" ...

And so the fact its public bot means PD can't have some rules limiting something? And what about "forum, chanel, loby, ingame" rules limiting your behaviour?
Not belive that it would...  - I don't understand what are u talking about.
I think that would...          - same don't understand...

[Rocka]

sure you wont, thats why im 100% sure that you will reply to this message

[DuffMan]

I would say something totally different than the question was if I know someone alse was right too.
nuff said

I said this because this would continue in the infinite. I wont debate whit u.

U 2 are like 2 childs, so I hope the clever one will stop with useless posts...
But honestly i don't understand your arguments Maniac.
U said u changed mind coz u saw something - and its so secret u cannot explain it to us?

[MaNiaC]

I would say something totally different than the question was if I know someone alse was right too.
nuff said

I said this because this would continue in the infinite. I wont debate whit u.

U 2 are like 2 childs, so I hope the clever one will stop with useless posts...
But honestly i don't understand your arguments Maniac.
U said u changed mind coz u saw something - and its so secret u cannot explain it to us?

Like i Said , Good is because have so much multi acc and so much leavers but , in 2nd post i thinking mb is better no rule for that because that is pub bot .

[Domagoj]

I would say something totally different than the question was if I know someone alse was right too.
nuff said

I said this because this would continue in the infinite. I wont debate whit u.

U 2 are like 2 childs, so I hope the clever one will stop with useless posts...
But honestly i don't understand your arguments Maniac.
U said u changed mind coz u saw something - and its so secret u cannot explain it to us?

Like i Said , Good is because have so much multi acc and so much leavers but , in 2nd post i thinking mb is better no rule for that because that is pub bot .

In that case, then it would be better that there were no bans because, you know, its a public bot so everyone can play on it and bans restrict certain people from playing on it...

[DuffMan]

I would say something totally different than the question was if I know someone alse was right too.
nuff said

I said this because this would continue in the infinite. I wont debate whit u.

U 2 are like 2 childs, so I hope the clever one will stop with useless posts...
But honestly i don't understand your arguments Maniac.
U said u changed mind coz u saw something - and its so secret u cannot explain it to us?

Like i Said , Good is because have so much multi acc and so much leavers but , in 2nd post i thinking mb is better no rule for that because that is pub bot .

In that case, then it would be better that there were no bans because, you know, its a public bot so everyone can play on it and bans restrict certain people from playing on it...

My point... And btw - the ban system is not working properly, coz everyone obstruct it...

[Geistesblitz]

Maniac and PLN stop trolling topics; this is your last warning.

[MiZiGe]

I must say, this is an interesting idea...I would not go into 50 games, 10 should be enough. Thing is, I can only imagine what load this would create on the DB, if it would be done the way I think.

Yes, we have to be aware that we do not want to give any limitations to the free access to the bot that is a trademark of PD. However, this would only limit hosting powers, and only for a rather short limited time (depending on the scale that would be chosen).

[Juggernaut99]

y, i hope this gets implemented in the new bot release (whenever it comes)
because there wont be no more noob hosts who leave games and get banned so they create another account but with this rule it will be hard because he must 'survive' 10 games without braking any rule to host a game!!

[Domagoj]

I must say, this is an interesting idea...I would not go into 50 games, 10 should be enough. Thing is, I can only imagine what load this would create on the DB, if it would be done the way I think.

Yes, we have to be aware that we do not want to give any limitations to the free access to the bot that is a trademark of PD. However, this would only limit hosting powers, and only for a rather short limited time (depending on the scale that would be chosen).

I think that 50 games was just a proforma number, now would it be 10, 20 or whatever is up to you guys to decide in case you choose to introduce this.

[Rocka]

Mostly those guys that create account every 2 days, have 10~15 games. In my opinion we should just stick to the 50, but 25 or so would be good aswell. I think 10 isn't enough

[kingW3]

gr8 idea it will avoid mute abuse

[Juggernaut99]

Mostly those guys that create account every 2 days, have 10~15 games. In my opinion we should just stick to the 50, but 25 or so would be good aswell. I think 10 isn't enough

yes your right 10 is not much but 50 is too much! so the best value for games played should be like 15-25.

-=-=Oh look 38 40 (82.6%) (83.3%) of 46 48 persons who vote chose yes!-=-=-