I would leave the unplayability of conditions on moderators.I.e. there are tards who will !rmk when player pick techies. This is indeed unreasonable. However if you pick let's say never as first and then observe your allies picking gondar,riki,slark,mortred etc. it is indeed unplayable condition IMO (though u will hardly get another 3 votes).The same situation is with noob team. If you thing somebody is noob, because enemy sucedeed in fb on him, is different than if he makes battlefury on centaur.
How can every idiot become admin??? I put several times ban request when some1 broke UR RULES and admin's denied with no reason... Elude <-- is he on drugs? ... I was talking whole time about how team 2 didn't want to rmk when guy left in min 8. and he said : U CAN'T FORCE THEM TO SWITCH !DENIED ... WTF. DELETE UR RULES WHEN THEY DON'T MEAN NOTHING TO U... FUCKING IDIOTS
in that game no mh man becaus all games in start i type -ah
@ aliradicaliThe term "unplayable conditions" is what is called "general clausule". If you cut it out and just make list of the conditions you are limiting yourself to this list. If new problem not listed here appears you won't be able to rmk bcs of it. Simply i would add just few exmples what can be (and what definitly can't ) unplayable condition. p.s. When i was typing the example above i was thinking on rd. If you have retarded team you probably wanna to rmk despite the fact you won't get votes.
The term "unplayable conditions" is what is called "general clausule". If you cut it out and just make list of the conditions you are limiting yourself to this list. If new problem not listed here appears you won't be able to rmk bcs of it.
Quote from: ArizaelCZ on November 22, 2010, 20:14The term "unplayable conditions" is what is called "general clausule". If you cut it out and just make list of the conditions you are limiting yourself to this list. If new problem not listed here appears you won't be able to rmk bcs of it. So do the opposite: define what DOESN'T count as unplayable conditions. Something along the lines of "A team's hero picks doesn't count as an unplayable condition. As it stands, with no further information, anything counts as an unplayable condition. This is bad because plenty of reasons why someone would want to remake are "bad" reasons. Narrowing things down by excluding some "bad" reasons doesn't mean that we suddenly need an exhaustive list of every possible acceptable reason to remake.If "my ally's dog at his mouse so he cannot control his hero" is not on the list of unplayable conditions, that's fine because anyone can figure out that it's a valid excuse (if true). However, one quick glance at the list of exceptions would tell any user or mod that "omg techis GG nab tim" is not.