Quote from: irs2k3 on November 19, 2010, 08:24NEGERTIVS you talk alot!!!....Youre target is to spamming here.....go to google and read what spam is nab
NEGERTIVS you talk alot!!!....Youre target is to spamming here.....
hes not spamming at all...And leavers at loading,pluggers,dcers have to be banned by host.they ruined the game,wasted the time of the others.When host leaves is almost a must to post a ban req.just copy/paste it from a txt doc where u changed the main things(ur nick,server,etc,etc)change names and post it.2 min
who had never made a mistake, has never tried anything new ~albert einstein
Yes, I agree that such players should be banned, only if they join and ruin many games.
when we were fighting againt the biggest power hunger i ever met, MrNiceGuy. Now i see him in you, no, you became way worse than him. He at least had some heart, he cared about ppl who were with him all the time.
Quote from: vaikiss on November 19, 2010, 10:27Quote from: irs2k3 on November 19, 2010, 08:24NEGERTIVS you talk alot!!!....Youre target is to spamming here.....go to google and read what spam is nabI want to ask you same question! i know what is spam and you should read in google what is it you will take a lesence...Quote from: XenyStyle on November 19, 2010, 10:48hes not spamming at all...And leavers at loading,pluggers,dcers have to be banned by host.they ruined the game,wasted the time of the others.When host leaves is almost a must to post a ban req.just copy/paste it from a txt doc where u changed the main things(ur nick,server,etc,etc)change names and post it.2 minAgreed but when they respond and give him answer he keep answering and explaining...and that's called typing without any knowledge :/
Negertivs, since you like to type and argue a lot, please type here with quotes witch rule should be different and more clear than it is now.Cause you have wrote some rules for moderators and that will never be accepted, since you are regular player.Post here your opinion about rules you would like to change (but post what kind of change), and we will respond is it possible or not to implement that (well I will respond and I think ek0 will respond too).Ok?
So conclusion: we need "plugers" 2 be banned by request only and !owner comand when host leaves
@NEGERTIVS:I don't know why do you think that every player that disconnects has a DSL connection and disconnects every game he plays.Then why do we need a !ban command? Lets auto ban every player that leaves the game (independant of the reason they left).The rule is made enough clear. If you leave, you'll be banned for a week. If you leave before creeps spawn or if you leave before the game ends, you'll get a warn. If you unplug, you'll be banned for 10 days. If you disconnect due to connection problems, you'll be unbanned without anything.@PerverzniUm:There is a reason that the !owner command is no longer used for taking owner after the host has left.
Actually you'll find that you are the one spamming here. Who is off-topic here? You. Who's making useless statements here (get "google lesence" people QUICK!)? Oh WAIT, it's you. I "spam" because I "talk a lot"? Wut? Typing without knowledge? Perhaps you should read the rules and reconsider that statement.-------------------------------------------------------------------------erm ek0, I never said that. I said that if you have a crappy connection, then you are more likely to disconnect, thus making it your fault. Quote from: ek0 on November 18, 2010, 18:36Yes, I agree that such players should be banned, only if they join and ruin many games.In the above statement you already said you agreed to this, right? The rules are quite clear yes, a leaver is a leaver, where is this "rule" that allows people to disconnect? Because it doesnt seem to exist in my space-time continuüm. Please quote it for me litterally, from the ingame rules section.The point of debate was if it could be possible to not punish the host for this leaver/disconnecter by actually making the one who ruined the game go through the extra trouble of requesting an unban/conversion to warn. Sigh.
Alright mrniceguy if apparently you are not capable of converting logical arguments in a logical plea into the rule-changes that would follow logically, then sure, Ill lay it out for you kindergarten-style.
1. If you want to be able to unban disconnecters, make a rule that allows disconnecting. You people claim that disconnecting is not a bannable offense, but there is no rule for it. Right now, according to the rules, a disconnecter is simply a leaver or even a plugger.
2. Now on to the rule changes resulting from my plea: I think hosts should not be bannable for banning rulebreakers. This could be done in several ways:Appending the "ban abuse" rule would be the easiest way:Game owner must take control of the game - Abusing the !banlast command is not allowed. - Banning a rulebreaker is never ban abuse.
Ill lay it out for you kindergarten-style.