What i wanted to point out with homeless shelter is that we are free in response to what aliradicali posted. There are no customers here, there are no paid jobs here, there is no quality of service that you can demand here.But we are trying to compete with other DotA communities by making a better rules and better bots. As i said above, we will update the rules and the bots extensively sometime this month.
What exactly is pd.eu's objective, if not to provide casual DotA players with a place to play DotA?Assuming that that IS your objective, why would you want to ignore feedback from said casual DotA players? No-one's demanding anything here, I'm merely curious why I get labeled "spammer" for disagreeing with certain rules. As far as I can tell, my suggestions would have a positive influence on the overall enjoyment of pd.eu DotA games, and implementing them is a matter of copypizza, so the real question would be why NOT implement them.
1.In this topic http://playdota.eu/forum/index.php/topic,24342.0.html quon said thatQuote# If 40% of users in game complain about unplayable conditions (with !rmk) in the first 10 minutes of the game, all players have to leave (and game owner can rehost the game).does not apply anymore???2.Is it possible to make a rule to stop intentional ally sabotage, eg. tiny tossing you to the enemy, someone force staffing you itd,....
# If 40% of users in game complain about unplayable conditions (with !rmk) in the first 10 minutes of the game, all players have to leave (and game owner can rehost the game).
Quote from: AliRadicali on October 17, 2010, 23:26What exactly is pd.eu's objective, if not to provide casual DotA players with a place to play DotA?Assuming that that IS your objective, why would you want to ignore feedback from said casual DotA players? No-one's demanding anything here, I'm merely curious why I get labeled "spammer" for disagreeing with certain rules. As far as I can tell, my suggestions would have a positive influence on the overall enjoyment of pd.eu DotA games, and implementing them is a matter of copypizza, so the real question would be why NOT implement them.Because I can't always be right and even when I am right I still have to understand other people's points of view and get to an agreement. I can't push people to do my bidding.
omg noob bora owned us:S
i heard from several people that boramir sucks at dota and in rage he always is PLUGGER
Quote from: quon on October 16, 2010, 20:13@ AliRadicaliThis system IS working fine else here wouldnt play 90% population on bnet. Just as I sad before, I will say it again:If u have productive idea, plz share it with us at our feedback section else dont post crap like playdota.eu is shit and finish your story there. If u dont like here, plz be free to play at other realms.I do have productive ideas, they just get locked because you ignore them. Just like you ignore my several complaints. Part of your JOB is to listen to customers' (AKA players) complaints and to improve the services you provide. But instead of listening to complaints and seriously trying to adress the issues brought up, you respond with one-liners like "rules are fine", "if you can't understand the rules don't host" and best of all "If you don't like it go play on another server". LOL!Let's draw an analogy here:I'm a customer in a restaurant. I think my food tastes a bit plain, so I ask the waiter for some salt. Should the waiter:a) Tell the customer to go eat somewhere else if he doesn't like it.b) Give the customer some salt.Well?I have made a complaint about the aforementioned "40% rule" in another thread, and it got pointedly ignored. I'll make my suggestion again:Add an exception to the rule: "Hero picks do not count as an "unplayable condition."Why? Because "our team has a (insert hero here), REMAKE!" should obviously not be considered a proper reason to remake a game.Now are you going to tell me to go find another restaurant, or are you going to give me my damn salt (or at least explain why you can't give me any)?Quote from: quon on October 16, 2010, 20:13Oh.. and yes, our system works fine a) I disagree with you. The rules are too vague and open to multiple interpretations, and several of the most common scenarios aren't covered by the rules. The fact that disconnecting is not mentioned in the rules at all proves this point perfectly IMO.b) Even if that were true, that doesn't mean things cannot be improved. The T-ford was an amazing vehicle when it was introduced, but that didn't mean that people went around saying "OMG this car is fine, no need to change it! LOCKED!"Would you rather drive this:or this:
@ AliRadicaliThis system IS working fine else here wouldnt play 90% population on bnet. Just as I sad before, I will say it again:If u have productive idea, plz share it with us at our feedback section else dont post crap like playdota.eu is shit and finish your story there. If u dont like here, plz be free to play at other realms.
Oh.. and yes, our system works fine
when we were fighting againt the biggest power hunger i ever met, MrNiceGuy. Now i see him in you, no, you became way worse than him. He at least had some heart, he cared about ppl who were with him all the time.
in that game no mh man becaus all games in start i type -ah
PS: Im NOT happy with pd.eu on 100% until they get fcking Gproxy support.... btw it should be in next bot release...bb have a nice day/ night ...
who had never made a mistake, has never tried anything new ~albert einstein