Author Topic: seriosly we need rule for SWITCH  (Read 3063 times)

Offline lovekiddos

  • Advanced Member
  • *
  • Topic Author
  • Posts: 109
  • Karma: +6/-18
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: seriosly we need rule for SWITCH
« Reply #15 on: September 10, 2010, 23:13 »
rofl thats funny.  look  :Ingame Rules / Game owner must balance the teams; this rule can be used for ur switch but  90 % players ignore this rule and moderator too. ofc is easier get easy win + better stats play 3v5 unfair game than play balanced game with switch but u know manny score hunters are happy when 2 or more from oposite team leave. look this links  : (    http://playdota.eu/forum/index.php/topic,19493.0.html     )
 http://playdota.eu/forum/index.php/topic,1425.0.html 
 
so why u will create rule what is already created ? no point   lol

that rules are good for one thing, u can print them and use while in restroom
99.9 game owners didnt give a frakk if game is balanced or not
so then u will find "PRO" games where is 7minute  and score is 10:1
frakking fun
PLAYING SINGLEPLAYER GAMES= MORE FUN, MULTIPLAYER = MORE NERVES AND HATE

Offline Quon

  • Hand of The King
  • Honored member
  • HolyShit Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9439
  • Country: cs
  • Karma: +363/-2085
  • garekds9
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: seriosly we need rule for SWITCH
« Reply #16 on: September 14, 2010, 11:18 »
U cant force any1 to switch or to rmk. If opposite team have 2 players more than yours (or more players) u r free to leave w/o ban. Btw imo !rmk and !switch is for noob games....

Offline ArizaelCZ

  • Retired Moderator
  • WickedSick Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1420
  • Karma: +72/-39
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: seriosly we need rule for SWITCH
« Reply #17 on: September 14, 2010, 14:45 »
U cant force any1 to switch or to rmk. If opposite team have 2 players more than yours (or more players) u r free to leave w/o ban. Btw imo !rmk and !switch is for noob games....
No. Its for pub games. And yes there is (even if little) difference.
Quote from: ArmyMaN^E^
in that game no mh man becaus all games in start i type -ah

Offline T-Bag

  • also known as Teddy Bear
  • Retired Moderator
  • HolyShit Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6127
  • Country: gb
  • Karma: +617/-118
  • Awards Winner of 3 Photoshop Challenge Contests [RARE] GFX staff member [RARE] Timbersaw Tour Winner Award [RARE]
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: seriosly we need rule for SWITCH
« Reply #18 on: September 14, 2010, 17:06 »
U cant force any1 to switch or to rmk. If opposite team have 2 players more than yours (or more players) u r free to leave w/o ban. Btw imo !rmk and !switch is for noob games....

u can leave w/o ban when opposite team have 2 players more....when is NOT switch on
when switch on u can leave w/o ban when is in opposite team more than 3 ppl.

so question: what i have to do when its 5v3 (or 4v2) and opposite team (where is more ppl) dont want switch?

Offline lovekiddos

  • Advanced Member
  • *
  • Topic Author
  • Posts: 109
  • Karma: +6/-18
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: seriosly we need rule for SWITCH
« Reply #19 on: September 14, 2010, 17:33 »
we need this rule..
if u will say that s free will or so, where s free will of ppls who are in weaker team?
so they have to sit and stare on screen? so time of their life will be wasted?
so other team will be threating them with bans and not switching?
this should be balanced
PLAYING SINGLEPLAYER GAMES= MORE FUN, MULTIPLAYER = MORE NERVES AND HATE

Offline Zerind

  • Advanced Member
  • *
  • Posts: 202
  • Karma: +17/-17
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: seriosly we need rule for SWITCH
« Reply #20 on: September 21, 2010, 01:57 »
Why is this lovekiddos starting the same topic under different names? Strange guy...
A -forfeit command would solve this, but that needs to be done by Iceforg.
Forced switch sucks, if one team gangs the shit out of the other, 2 of the losing team leaves, it is not fair to put sy there from the winning team. Just not fair. Just let them quickly finish. And, like I said, -ff will solve this.
(-ff would mean that a team can give up: if 100% of one team votes, they lose, game is over.)

Offline ArizaelCZ

  • Retired Moderator
  • WickedSick Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1420
  • Karma: +72/-39
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: seriosly we need rule for SWITCH
« Reply #21 on: September 21, 2010, 13:49 »
Forfeit command can be made by pd staff no need icefrog.
Now even you can understand that its an issue. So there is no need to insult somebody who tries to do something with this. As you mentioned the best solution would be !ff command working which will be in next season.
Quote from: ArmyMaN^E^
in that game no mh man becaus all games in start i type -ah

Offline Zerind

  • Advanced Member
  • *
  • Posts: 202
  • Karma: +17/-17
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: seriosly we need rule for SWITCH
« Reply #22 on: September 21, 2010, 21:34 »
Forfeit command can be made by pd staff no need icefrog.
Now even you can understand that its an issue. So there is no need to insult somebody who tries to do something with this. As you mentioned the best solution would be !ff command working which will be in next season.

Hmm , earlier I have read a thread about forfeit, and experts back then said !ff was not possible. Game only sends stats properly if throne/tree is down. So a !ff command would sometimes give faulty stats, which means those stats couldn't be used, what could lead to abuses (losing team always !ff-ing before end not to get bad stats). So the conclusion back then was that DotA itself had to be changed, to be able to send stats on early ending too.
If that has been solved since, then great, !ff will help a LOT!

Offline fnelleh

  • Junior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 37
  • Karma: +17/-30
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: seriosly we need rule for SWITCH
« Reply #23 on: October 06, 2010, 10:33 »
Isn't it possible to code that when people vote to forfeit, the tree will get a certain amount of damage and would die, thus ending the game in a normal way?

The switch function itself makes no sense. A game is set between a team of players (usually 5 versus 5), who are working together. When people leave there is no point in switching, as it changes every little dynamic of that game when heroes are thrown about teams. That doesn't make it a challenging game. It makes it random and no longer (slightly) competitive.

Offline zero.infinity

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 87
  • Karma: +27/-21
  • Mr.Niceguy Fan
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: seriosly we need rule for SWITCH
« Reply #24 on: October 06, 2010, 10:53 »
Isn't it possible to code that when people vote to forfeit, the tree will get a certain amount of damage and would die, thus ending the game in a normal way?

The switch function itself makes no sense. A game is set between a team of players (usually 5 versus 5), who are working together. When people leave there is no point in switching, as it changes every little dynamic of that game when heroes are thrown about teams. That doesn't make it a challenging game. It makes it random and no longer (slightly) competitive.

I agree. Switch should be disabled like in all league competitive games. As i see people play on PD for rank. On Northrend you have leagues also, and when people leave it's just bad luck (3v5) and sometimes the 3 win, and sometimes the 5 win. It's all part of the game.
Mister :(
I love you
:|