If you remove my tweak of high psr players punishment and issue a cron job to subtract ~5 psr every week from all players above 1500 (with minimun of 1500) it might deliver the best result
managed to push all 3 accounts from top15, to top 10 .. ... b o r i n g
I honestly don't know if I should envy you for having enough free time to do this, or be glad that I have better things to do with my life rather than doing anything remotely similar to this.
Cool story. Yet I`m not the one with 50 AWARDS sitting in my profile. Took me around 150 games total , accumulated on those 3 accounts. More than average but not that much.
Maybe I should've picked a different approach, now that I look into it I did sound a bit hostile there, my bad. Am too lazy to go into longer discussions right now.Let's try to keep it simple. 3 accs, why though?
And what i did was agha+dagger+refresher+fleetJust fun to see how enemies are getting pulled from one tide to another multiple timesEspecially cool when enemy bloodseeker ruptured you into a lotus
If you want to let everyone play with everyone regardless PSR, the formula for balancing needs some weird AI implementation. In these cases (For games without locked players) simply assigning 1-2-1-2-1-2-1-2-1-2 the players ordered by PSR would be enough. So both teams geta) a top PSR andb) a bottom PSR
but we treat 50 point difference the same as 1500-1550 as 1800-1850
1800 and 1850 players might be quite similar in "skill", 1500 and 1550 players might be anything from 1200- to 1800+
Talking about balance, how can you balance a game when one player can win the game with 4 worse players in a team? You cant put equally abled players in both teams because it takes to much time or it is not possible at all.
If the administration would let people gain points faster there to increase top players score it would be easier to separate games by points (based on my 1st paragraph).