Tournament challenges

[CoMMoN1337]

http://dota.eurobattle.net/la/forum/index.php?action=gameinfo;sa=game;gid=5927362

50 deny challenge again.

So while I was trying to push the fucking waves so we can get some map control and win the game, you were somewhere doing nothing and denying with ogre, nice.

[UltimateTroll]

http://dota.eurobattle.net/la/forum/index.php?action=gameinfo;sa=game;gid=5927446
50 denIeee,tried to go for str bonus,but oh well,25 min game

Edit:i just  checked it,so it was 50 strength,not 100 like i first thought,count that in too,if season ein challenges count

[jeandarc]

50+ denies, 8 towers + win


http://dota.eurobattle.net/la/forum/index.php?action=gameinfo;sa=game;gid=5927495

[jeandarc]

oh i just realized that retarded destroyer put his 1550 psr friend in there, fuck my life.

[ClaraSchuman]

50+ denies, 8 towers + win


http://dota.eurobattle.net/la/forum/index.php?action=gameinfo;sa=game;gid=5927495

nice game bro 

[Hagarath]

50+ denies, 8 towers + win


http://dota.eurobattle.net/la/forum/index.php?action=gameinfo;sa=game;gid=5927495

Dedication at its finest right there.

[CoMMoN1337]

Still not 1600+ though.
So still not valid.

Btw lexy, if I redo both 7 towers + 50 denies in a single 1600+ game, you will change from 2 points to 3 ?

[LexMonster]

Still not 1600+ though.
So still not valid.

Btw lexy, if I redo both 7 towers + 50 denies in a single 1600+ game, you will change from 2 points to 3 ?

Yes

I will also write 2-3 new rules when i get back home.
And guys, please state your opinion about <1600 PSR thing.
Lets say if there are 1 ( or 2) players bellow 1600 PSR in game, you get only half of the original points. That way, you still get some points, but its not a noob game (kinda), because only 1 (or 2) players are bellow the line..? What you think about that?

[CoMMoN1337]

Still not 1600+ though.
So still not valid.

Btw lexy, if I redo both 7 towers + 50 denies in a single 1600+ game, you will change from 2 points to 3 ?

Yes

I will also write 2-3 new rules when i get back home.
And guys, please state your opinion about <1600 PSR thing.
Lets say if there are 1 ( or 2) players bellow 1600 PSR in game, you get only half of the original points. That way, you still get some points, but its not a noob game (kinda), because only 1 (or 2) players are bellow the line..? What you think about that?

imo just keep it entirely 1600+ and leave it at that, for fucks sake only like 8 wins are required to get from 1500 to 1600 if ppl cant even win 8 more games than losses it's rly sad, even some with more losses than wins have 1600 after very many games

[Hagarath]

Still not 1600+ though.
So still not valid.

Btw lexy, if I redo both 7 towers + 50 denies in a single 1600+ game, you will change from 2 points to 3 ?

Yes

I will also write 2-3 new rules when i get back home.
And guys, please state your opinion about <1600 PSR thing.
Lets say if there are 1 ( or 2) players bellow 1600 PSR in game, you get only half of the original points. That way, you still get some points, but its not a noob game (kinda), because only 1 (or 2) players are bellow the line..? What you think about that?

imo just keep it entirely 1600+ and leave it at that, for fucks sake only like 8 wins are required to get from 1500 to 1600 if ppl cant even win 8 more games than losses it's rly sad, even some with more losses than wins have 1600 after very many games

Exactly, but i still think people with less than 1600 should get 1/4 of the points.

[jeandarc]

Im personally against bending the rules because it will probably result in complicating things. Keep it clean as it is (1600+), the challenges are not and most of them can be finished easily in any 1600+ game.

[jeandarc]

The challenges are not extreme*

I stated my opinion about that "giving half of the points to the finished challenges in below 1600 psr games" thingy.


Theres no edit thingy here, so yeah.

[Akuma]

I must admit both common and joan have point - leaving it 1600+ but for the sake of players (including myself) who play most of the games in the time where its hard even making a game I will vote for allowing to bend the rules.

Maybe I can suggest making it having AT LEAST 3-4 players with 1600+ in your opponents team, and not counting those in your team - after all you play with them and the lower they are they make game harder as well as challenges.

I also support idea that challenges completed in lesser games should bring half points. Any less would be pointless. After all this should be about fun, and available to everybody since everybody can see it in channel /topic.

[LexMonster]

Just an update for you guys, I added 5 'new' rules (it was actually more like rewriting old ones)

3. You get 2 points if you complete any 2 challenges in the same game
4. You get 3 points if you complete 2 challenges in the same game (one of these 2 challenges must be last posted challenge + any other)
5. You get 4 points if you complete any 3 challenges in the same game
6. You get 6 points if you complete 3 challenges in the same game (one of these 3 challenges must be last posted challenge + any other two)
11. You can also complete challenges from 1st season, but you will get only half of the original points (which is 0.25)

[jeandarc]

@rule 6; did u mean that we will get quarter of the points cuz the half of the point is 0.50, or am i missing something?