Author Topic: Complaint about ksv decision  (Read 69 times)

Offline Akuma

  • WickedSick Member
  • *
  • Topic Author
  • Posts: 1306
  • Country: ie
  • Karma: +643/-436
  • Awards Making 50 bets in Footbal Betting [COMMON] Winner of 1 Photoshop Challenge Contest [COMMON] Jungle Race Tour Winner [RARE] Winner of 5 Uther Party Tours Castle Fight Winner [RARE] B&U staff member [RARE] Shadow Raze Tour Award [RARE] Junior Tournament Member [RARE] MadBalls Tournament Winner [RARE]
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Complaint about ksv decision
« on: February 10, 2020, 16:50 »

1. Ban duration is too low.
2. He failed to warn a player even though he wrote he did.;sa=player;sid=1;nick=[ugt]xhitsux

for comparing sake
Jimmy gave a player 4 days ban and 2 warns which is a good decision.
(I guess that votekick abuse part was just for the sake of pointing out such thing is bannable as well, since writing !votekick once against someone was never a bannable thing, and that full ban length was based on national intolerance.)
I was confused with this, and it was not only once, but it happens from time to time to /w wrong bot. If it was changed to la-custom or custom-la everyone would understand why is like that. But like this you must to read on forum to understand, even if you don't understand..

Offline cen

  • Admin
  • WickedSick Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1709
  • Country: si
  • Karma: +187/-41
  • Lok'tar Ogar
  • Awards LA High Staff [EPIC] MadBalls Tournament Winner [RARE] MVP Member [LEGENDARY]
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Re: Complaint about ksv decision
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2020, 09:45 »
Ban is now applied as it was decided.

Ban duration is not too short, it is in line with the rule book sanctions. Rule book sanctions are recommendation to moderator but moderators can deviate from that as they think is proper. That explains the difference between cases.

Decision was correct just not applied. Closing.